User:Yann/Valued images/2009-2014

Mehndi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mehndi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support High resolution image, interesting perspective, meets all the criterias.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Cosmetic modification of the scope. --Eusebius (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment While I have absolutely no intend to oppose this image, I am a bit worried about 'co-nominations' like this kind where support is agreed upon in advance by two users. Lycaon (talk) 08:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Candidate is ok for me. About Lycaon's remark: inviting new contributions to the project is very ok (thank you for that), but we should avoid promising a support, or explicitly asking somebody for a support, as it has occured with other users already. --Eusebius (talk) 09:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

@Lycaon. I do not think I've done something wrong here. The user asked me to look over his images and tell him which one IMO could be VI. I did, I reviewed the images and tried to explain the difference between VI and QI to the user. I knew I would support the image for both VI and QI. What's wrong in telling this to the user? After few declined images on QI, I believed the user could use some encouragement. In any case, if you believe that somebody is guily of wrongdoing here, it is only me, and me alone, not Yann. So instead of "two users", may I please ask you to say "Mbz1". Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 10:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

I said I was 'a bit' worried, Mila, not that you had done something 'wrong'. Lycaon (talk) 10:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Support For a moment, I considered if File:Mehndi1.JPG would be better in review size as, due to the close-up you can better see the details in the Mehndi patterns. But, I think the nominated image wins because it shows the extent of the Mehndi on the arms and legs. The flash lightning reflecting on the shiny cloth underneath is a little unfortunate and gives a little bad contrast in the image. But still a good illustration of the scope. --Slaunger (talk) 21:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Arve Annemasse

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arve River.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criterias.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 11:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Indian wedding

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Var Mala (Hindu wedding).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Should the scope for the image be changed to "Traditional Hindu Wedding ceremonies in India"? Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:51, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the scope is too broad. Although I do not have a detailed knowledge of Indian weddings, it is my feeling that there are quite some religious variations and perhaps also regional(?), which makes it difficult to state that this particular image is representative of wedding ceremonies. The images is BTW no longer used in en:India, as it has been replaced after two days by another wedding photo (which is not properly licensed and only hosted on en BTW). --Slaunger (talk) 22:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Vote changed following scope change. --Slaunger (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Wedding ceremonies in India to Traditional Hindu Wedding ceremonies in India --Yann (talk) 19:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Question The person in between the couple: What is his role in the ceremony at the instant this photo was taken (just trying to understand...)? --Slaunger (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I just learned that what is going on at the picture is discribed in the Wikipedia article. It calls Var Mala. I also found there is a category for Hindu weddings. There are few other images in the category, but I guess I could  Support this one now because it is described in the article. I'm going to add the image to the article w:Hindu wedding. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Thank you Mila, for enlightening me! Now I understand much better. After reading the Hindu wedding page I would actually propose a further specification of the scope to "Var Mala" if this is a generally accepted term for this part of the wedding ceremonies. I think the nominated image is the best illustration we have of that scope. If "Var Mala" is an accepted term, I also think it would be helpful if this term was specifically added to the image page. --Slaunger (talk) 20:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm currently bothered by the "in India" precision, which I don't think is useful (but maybe I'm wrong). I be fine with Hindu wedding as a scope (although I haven't reviewed the possible competitors), I think "Var Mala" might be too narrow. --Eusebius (talk) 21:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree that the "in India" part probably should go. Concerning "Var Mala": Now that I have read about it, the hindu wedding ceremony really has a lot of built-in sub-ceremonies, divided in ceremonies before, under and after the wedding. Even under the wedding there are quite a few steps, of which the depicted one is the "Var Mala". That's why I believe a subscope may be warranted. Considering how many hindu weddings there are annually world-wide, I think it is relevant to go into fairly deep details.--Slaunger (talk) 21:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Traditional Hindu Wedding ceremonies in India to Var Mala --Yann (talk) 07:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Meets all criteria for me now. --Slaunger (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

World Health Organisation building

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World Health Organisation building, Geneva..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I prefer this one, in spite of the lower quality, because it shows the main facade and the logo. I think the overall aspect of the building is properly illustrated. --Eusebius (talk) 17:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. World Health Organisation building south face.jpg: 0
2. World Health Organisation headquarters, Geneva, north and west sides.jpg: +1 
=>
File:World Health Organisation building south face.jpg: Declined.
File:OMS.jpg: Promoted.

--Eusebius (talk) 16:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

United Nations headquarters, Geneva

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
United Nations headquarters, Geneva (Palace of Nations, interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criterias and used in many articles. IMO is the best image for the scope.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the phrasing of the scope is too long. I think "Palace of Nations (interior)" is unambiguous enough. Or maybe "Palace of Nations, Geneva (interior)"? --Eusebius (talk) 21:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

   Comment Well, the phrasing can be changed, but it doesn't change the scope. With a long phrasing, I was just trying to make things clearer. Yann (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

  I'm not sure it is clearer: is the scope about the institution or about the building? Maybe I'm getting too picky here. --Eusebius (talk) 07:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

  It seems difficult to separate the institution from the building here. Actually it could include both scopes, since it is a United Nations conference in the United Nations Geneva building. Yann (talk) 08:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment After several days of reflexion... I think you're right on the fact that the institution can hardly be separated from the building. I still think it's not a "pretty" scope, but it's probably the best way to present it after all (name of the institution is relevant, name of the city is relevant because otherwise one would think of NY, name of the building is relevant, interior subscope is relevant). I remove my opposition.--Eusebius (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Anthony Glise

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthony Glise.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info American guitarist, composer and author.

•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 07:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Geneva

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geneva.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Closest competitor would be File:Geneva aerial, summer 2007.JPG but I don't think it could be improved enough to be more illustrative than this one. --Eusebius (talk) 10:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Though I do wonder whether a well-chosen Valued image set, including this image and a few specific details might be a good idea as well? Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Idea is interesting, but it would never been promoted: in a VI set for a (large) city, there's always something missing, or the set cannot be homogeneous in style/quality. A VI set is always riskier, and even though it could be sensible here, I think a single image can do the trick. --Eusebius (talk) 05:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Yury Bandazhevsky

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yury Bandazhevsky.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request Could you please geotag? --Eusebius (talk) 09:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

   Comment Done, although I don't see the point for a portrait. Yann (talk) 11:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 07:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 19:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Rémy Pagani

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rémy Pagani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request Could you please geotag? --Eusebius (talk) 10:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

   Comment Done, although I don't see the point for a portrait. Yann (talk) 11:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me. About geotag: well, it is visibly taken at a public meeting, so it can useful to know about the event or the place. --Eusebius (talk) 07:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 19:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Sainte Clothilde

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sainte Clothilde.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK for me. Apparently Clothilde has no clear and definite attributes. I slightly prefer the nominated picture over File:Vitrail Sainte Clotilde Saint-Mihiel 271108.jpg, because of the less dumb look of the saint and of the caption in the window itself. --Eusebius (talk) 11:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Slaunger (talk) 20:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

International Space Station

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
International Space Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Shows the complete ISS upto date. This image is also very good. Do you think a MVR is needed? Yann (talk) 11:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Support There are really many images to consider. The other one you mention looks more spectacular, but I think the background in this one is better for getting some contrast to see the details of the space station. Truly an amazing construction floating in space. --Slaunger (talk) 13:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Fort l'Écluse

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fort l'Écluse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Satisfies criteria; hard to choose since File:Fort l'Écluse, inférieur.jpg is very good too. This one shows the upper as well as the lower fort. Also, it shows the terrain; this is important for this subject. If I'm not mistaken, the heading is closer to NNW than to N. Walter Siegmund (talk) 14:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
  • I corrected the heading. Yann (talk) 19:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Saris

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria met and slightly better with the fixed sky. Lycaon (talk) 21:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Sari.jpg: 0
2. Sari 2.jpg: +1 <--
3. Blue sari 2.jpg: 0
=>
File:Sari.jpg: Undecided.
File:Sari 2.jpg: Promoted <--
File:Blue sari 2.jpg: Undecided.

--Yann (talk) 21:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Interior of Notre-Dame basilica in Geneva

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notre-Dame basilica in Geneva, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks ok to me. I think a corrected version of your vertical shot would have been fine too. --Eusebius (talk) 11:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Leo Tolstoy

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leo Tolstoy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I hesitated with this painting, but I think this image is better because it is a photograph rather than a painting. Yann (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

* Oppose Not geocoded. -- Rastaman3000 (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC) OK -- Rastaman3000 (talk) 16:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

• •  Done Surprisingly, I could find the place and geocoded it. Yann (talk) 16:28, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Will you nominate this portrait once fully restored? It could be an alternative image. --Myrabella (talk) 20:13, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Well, it could be an alternative if it were restored, but it is not, and that restoration is not in my plan in the near future, and may be not in my capabilities. Yann (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
• The nominated image is probably not the best close-up portrait of Tolstoy to be found in Commons but it is of historical and cultural interest (the writer, the place, the technique...). I would have supported if its colors (and grain) hadn't been altered since the first upload. It is a matter of importance for an image claimed to be "the first color photo portrait in Russia" (follow the external link given in the description for a reference). --Myrabella (talk) 11:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment We need to be judging it on the scope "Leo Tolstoy", so to me the other aspects of the image (eg historical significance) are only significant if there is nothing else to differenciate this image from other portraits of him. Is this the best representation of Leo? --Tony Wills (talk) 21:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment Under this aspect, this portrait—a photo too—gives a better idea of what Leo Tolstoy looked like. (But the original photo used for the nominated image was taken at Yasnaya Polyana, a very important place in Tolstoy's life). --Myrabella (talk) 08:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
      • Yes, this portrait is quite good, but 1. It needs restoration, which is beyond my capabilities, 2. We don't know the photographer, the date and the place, so it can't be geocoded, which makes this color portrait slightly more suited. Yann (talk) 09:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
        • I don't agree with the second argument: we know the photographer and the place ("Photo by Sass, Moscow"), and the period (between 1880 and 1886), source: Library of Congress catalog, following the link given in the description. --Myrabella (talk) 14:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
          • Well, right, we have a word, but that is not enough. We don't even know if Sass is a photographer or an office or an agency... If you can restore this portrait, I think that it would be a good candidate. Until that, this picture is the best image we currently have for this scope. Yann (talk) 21:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
          • OK, you convinced me. --Myrabella (talk) 07:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support See the discussion above. --Myrabella (talk) 07:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I don't think this is the best picture of Tolstoy at all. It is an early colour photograph, and may be valuable in another scope, but there are far better pictures of Tolstoy eg File:Leo_Tolstoy01.jpg (a bit dark but very good detail compared to other versions of same painting) and File:Count Tolstoy, with hat.jpg. --Tony Wills (talk) 13:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • The quality is not the only important criteria: I think that it is as much as important to know the exact place and date, and I think that a photograph is better suited than a painting. Yann (talk) 13:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality wasn't my prime interest. For this scope I want the best representation of Leo. A good painting can be better than a photograph. I am not sure why exact place and time is important to you for a portrait? --Tony Wills (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Support. I prefer this photo than a painting as he's more natural, less official in this picture. --Dereckson (talk) 00:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Lanza del Vasto

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lanza del Vasto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I definetly prefer this one: more character and quality -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Most valued? The value is in how well it shows the subject I suppose. Both images have very similar merit, both have almost identical description pages (both have minimal information, but probably sufficient for VI). I propose that we nominate these two images as a set, full face + profile, each shows a different aspect, together they show how he looked (although I would tend to crop the full-face portrait so his head was about the same size in both). (I wonder what he would have thought about the time we waste on Commons "The machine enslaves, the hand sets free. —Lanza del Vasto" ;-) --Tony Wills (talk) 10:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Lanza.jpg: 0
2. Lanza del vasto.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Lanza.jpg: Undecided.
File:Lanza del vasto.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Yann (talk) 19:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Saint-Pierre cathedral, Geneva, exterior

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Pierre cathedral, Geneva, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Full view improved by the distorsion corrections; documented and geocoded = the most valuable image in Commons for this scope IMO. Just a small remark: the file is entitled "Fronton de la cathédrale (...)" (=Pediment) "; "Facade" would be more accurate. --Myrabella (talk) 00:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes, I will rename it. Yann (talk) 17:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 21:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Paul Ariès

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Ariès.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 21:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Saturn

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saturn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The only other potential candidate is this one which is bigger, but a big part of the planet is in the shadow, so I think that the nominated image is better. Yann (talk) 11:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 Comment This could be a featured picture, don't you think? Originalwana (talk) 12:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but this is unrelated to a Valued Image nomination. VI is a completely different processus. Yann (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

I have already nominated it for featured picture status and the discussion is ongoing TonyBallioni (talk) 16:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Great image. Originalwana (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I went to nominate this file and found out it had already been nominated. The other image is good as well but this one is the only image of Saturn that shows the planet at a good angle and where it isn't obscured by too much shadow. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Incubator

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Incubator.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Scope should be "Incubator", not "Incubators". -- JovanCormac 15:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Done Yann (talk) 15:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Scope correct now, and it's indeed the best picture in the category. -- JovanCormac 05:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support The most beautiful! --Myrabella (talk) 11:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Mohandas K. Gandhi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mohandas K. Gandhi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, as promised. Airwolf (talk) 23:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support It is better variant for me -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I prefer this one too. --Myrabella (talk) 09:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Shivraj Singh Chauhan

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shivraj Singh Chauhan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met, good --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Education in India

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Education in India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Very impressive illustration. All criteria met. Is "on a compound" common English? --Ikar.us (talk) 23:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I am not a native English speaker, but it is commonly used in India. Yann (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- The scope is too broad. Maybe a "classroom in Indoa" or something similar. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • The point is that this is NOT a school: the students from several schools come to an "ashram" for the exam. Yann (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I think scope is fine; India, masses of people and then picture full of pupils everywhere just not on chairs in classroom. It talkes for itselve. --Mile (talk) 19:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose the image is very exellent and illustrative but he must find a scope that is not a main category --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment I beg to differ with the last part of Archaeodontosaurus's comment. Scope might be deemed too large, but VI rules don't forbid to link a scope to a main category. --Myrabella (talk) 07:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Following the explanations of Myrabella on the scope, I support this nomination --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support So do I.----Jebulon (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 00:53, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Funambulus pennantii (Northern Palm Squirrel)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Funambulus pennantii (Northern Palm Squirrel).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please format the scope according to guidelines for species. Lycaon (talk) 17:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

  I thought I did so. The guidelines say: official latin name (vernacular name). Isn't it what I did?

  You came close. Now it is ;-). Lycaon (talk) 08:39, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Support - all criteria meet --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 18:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

J'accuse...!

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
J'accuse...!.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I prefer the complete version. Lycaon (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
•  SupportMe too --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. J'accuse - Gallica - page 1.jpg: 0
3. J'accuse.jpg: +2 <--
=>
File:J'accuse - Gallica - page 1.jpg: Declined.
File:J'accuse.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Ikar.us (talk) 20:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Abbé Pierre

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbé Pierre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• I'd prefer something like , but it's too small. So I  Support this. --Ikar.us (talk) 17:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Does the Harcourt Watermark/signature count for criteria 3 (No distracting, irrelevant elements (this can be mitigated if it is hard to re-establish the scenario)), if yes, the watermark guideline says that a new version should be created without the watermark and nominate it instead of this version. Esby (talk) 22:47, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
  • IMO, the signature adds value to the picture. Yann (talk) 07:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
    •  CommentAbbé Pierre is presented as a "social activist", an he was. I'm not sure that a picture made by "Studio Harcourt" depicts the subject very well... "Studio Harcourt" is a very expensive and very snob professionnal photo studio...--Jebulon (talk) 14:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
      • He was poised enough to reject the highest award the French government offers. So if he posed for that photo, he probably endorsed it. --Ikar.us (talk) 14:46, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
      • He was also a catholic priest and a member of parliament, so he had a personality much richer than that. Yann (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
      •  Comment"social activist" is not my qualification, it is in the description page of this file. Well... He was Grand Officer of the Légion d'Honneur too, which is the second highest dignity of this Order. Furthermore, Maybe, for him, to be a catholic priest, a Resistant during WW2, a Member of Parliament during the fifties, was a way to be a "social activist" ? Let me think so...--Jebulon (talk) 10:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 14:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Bufo melanostictus (Common Indian Toad or Common Asiatic/Asian Toad or Black-spined Toad)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bufo melanostictus (Common Indian Toad or Common Asiatic/Asian Toad or Black-spined Toad).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I am not sure what the scope should be: Bufo melanostictus or Duttaphrynus melanostictus. Idem for the vernacular name. Please help. Yann (talk) 17:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment le nom officiel est Bufo melanostictus; Duttaphrynus melanostictus est un synonyme --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Question Does the scope need to be so long? --Ikar.us (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 22:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Amitabh Bachchan

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amitabh Bachchan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• A Bollywood actor? Hm. But there are many articles about him.  Support, best in category. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:03, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
  • He is one of the most known people in India, more than any official persons. Notability is relative. Yann (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:42, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Yves Calvi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yves Calvi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good for studio photo, valued people -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:13, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Chambal bridge, National Highway 3

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chambal bridge, National Highway 3.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• There are two bridges on the image. Is the second a railway bridge? Should the scope be Chambal bridges near Dholpur? --Ikar.us (talk) 20:07, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
  • The metallic structure is not really a bridge. It is a pumping system. Information added. Yann (talk) 12:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
• A pipe bridge is a bridge, too. But perhaps not so important.  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 17:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
  • It doesn't cross the whole river. See File:Bridge on Chambel river, NH3.jpg. Thanks for your support. Yann (talk) 17:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:57, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Chambal River

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chambal River.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best image of the natural river. --Ikar.us (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support sufficient length of river and surrounding plains. Agree that it's best image around. Would much prefer a panoramo showing the opposite stretch of the river, though. Jolly Janner (talk) 21:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:58, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Nathalie Baye

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nathalie Baye.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose Prefer colour pictures and the signature is too distracting for a valued portait. --Jolly Janner (talk) 20:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

This is NOT a watermark but a signature by the artist. And please read review guidelines. We need to choose among available pictures. Yann (talk) 02:55, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

 Support Like it more than the others. Signature is removable. Pitke (talk) 10:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 Support Best of available pics. Petritap (talk) 14:12, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:13, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Macaca mulatta

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macaca mulatta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support This one seems to me the best --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

MVR Scores: 
1. Rhesus Macaque, Red Fort, Agra.jpg: +1 <--
2. Rhesus Macaque, Red Fort, Agra, India.jpg: 0
3. Monkey yawning 1.jpg: 0
=>
File:Rhesus Macaque, Red Fort, Agra.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Rhesus Macaque, Red Fort, Agra, India.jpg: Declined. 
File:Monkey yawning 1.jpg: Declined.

--Myrabella (talk) 19:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Taj Mahal

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taj Mahal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Adding a geotag to competitors if there are some good ones won't be quite difficult IMO. --Myrabella (talk) 07:46, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Question May I ask...it seems to be made at high noon, not at 6+ am as presented in metafile rigth ? I am surprised there are so few photos of such an photogenic object. --Mile (talk) 21:33, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
  • About the choice of pictures: have you looked through the sub-Category:South side of the Taj Mahal (53 images...)? This is a 2005 FP for example. --Myrabella (talk) 22:14, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
  • At places that are destination of world tourism, metadata is always doubtful, because the camera timezone may be set to the photographer's home longitude. But at this latitude, so close to the tropic, in high summer, I'd expect the shadows to be shorter at high noon!? --Ikar.us (talk) 22:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
    • I think the time in EXIF data is UTC. Isn't OK? Yann (talk) 03:08, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
      • The view is north, the shadows come from right. It looks like early morning in India. But we didn't care about incorrect EXIF data yet. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
• Thanx Myrabella, thats what i had expected. That FP is not bad for that time (2005), there are some better. --Mile (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support After checking over the related categories, OK to me, all criteria met. Very nice geocoded image of the mausoleum taken from the classical point of view; there are some interesting alternatives with another point of view (e.g. File:Taj Mahal-09.jpg) or showing more of the entire complex (e.g.File:Taj Mahal-08.jpg, File:Taj Mahal, Agra, India-23Feb2007b.jpg), but I think we can choose a picture with the emblematic view of the main building for the scope. I will give a hand to complete the description. --Myrabella (talk) 09:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I dont find it as representative in this spectre, most of it because high-noon colors, doesnt seem to be morning one, something like this i would prefer, more romantic view :File:TajMahalbyAmalMongia.jpg --Mile (talk) 12:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Would you please open a Most Valued Review then? The challenger you've pointed out is not difficult to geocode. --Myrabella (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Done, also the geocoding. --Mile (talk) 15:21, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Look at the heading of the shadows, and the position of lighted half of the domes. If the challenger is in the early morning, as it states, this one must be earlier. The coulours on the other one may be caused by clouds, but mainly by chemical manipulation, as it also states. --Ikar.us (talk) 16:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
    • I want to say this shot is made in "bad" time of the day, i would say around noon. On left side You can see cumulus, they are not forming in morning hours, anyway colors arent so nice, for such romantic object there could be warmer temperature colors. --Mile (talk) 18:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
      • Mile, I really don't understand what you are up to. What does it matter the time of the day if the picture is of good quality? Now it is probably going to be a featured picture, so quality does not seem to be an issue. And finally this is quite irrelavant for VI anyway. We are concerned here about matching the scope, and quality is only one among many parameters. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support meets all criteria IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 16:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Taj Mahal, Agra, India.jpg: +1
2. TajMahalbyAmalMongia.jpg: -1 
=>
File:Taj Mahal, Agra, India.jpg: Promoted.
File:TajMahalbyAmalMongia.jpg: Declined.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Rajagopal P. V.

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rajagopal P. V..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The only good image for which I could find the exact location, and therefore geocoding. Shows Rajagopal for what is known: a public figure talking to the medias. Yann (talk) 08:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Request I am ready to support this VIC, but maybe could you give the full name of this political figure in the scope: Rajagopal Puthan Veetil (according to the en:WP article). --Myrabella (talk) 18:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Well, nobody uses his full name. He is quite known as an activist, but most people only know him as Rajagopal. Yann (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
    • I checked through the web and he is almost always called Rajagopal or P.V. Rajagopal indeed, even on the website of Ekta Parishad and on websites linked with this movement. --Myrabella (talk) 11:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with reason + taken at a notable moment => OK to me, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 11:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Raghuvansh Prasad Singh

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raghuvansh Prasad Singh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Marble Rocks

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marble Rocks.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, all criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Umaid Bhawan Palace, Jodhpur

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Umaid Bhawan Palace, Jodhpur.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. Valuable palace -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:27, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Ram Raja Temple, Orchha

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ram Raja Temple, Orchha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:14, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Raja Mahal, Orchha

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raja Mahal, Orchha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:16, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Chaturbhuj Temple, Orchha

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chaturbhuj Temple, Orchha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

I hesitated with that one, but I think this one illustrates the monument better.

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Superphénix

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Superphenix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Jahangir Mahal, Orchha

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jahangir Mahal, Orchha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Difficult to get a view of the whole monument without the Raja Mahal in the front.

•  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 23:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Krishna

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krishna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I don't know much about this scope, but it looks fine to me. I assume that the statue is PD-old or otherwise ineligible for copyright (COM:L). --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:19, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Temples of Baijnath

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Temples of Baijnath.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Changuch

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Changuch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Nanda Khat

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nanda Khat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Panwali Dhar

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panwali Dhar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:54, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Pindari glacier

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pindari glacier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Little Boy

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Little Boy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:34, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Martin Luther King

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Martin Luther King.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope, and good references. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:59, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Atomic bombing of Nagasaki

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atomic bombing of Nagasaki.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 Support. Scary picture, but best in scope.--Jetstreamer (talk) 18:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 11:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 11:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Sally Ride

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sally Ride.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Nanda Devi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nanda Devi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support.All criteria met.--Jetstreamer (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:04, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Charlton Heston

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charlton Heston.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

best portrait in scope --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:54, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Grace Kelly

File:Kelly, Grace (Rear Window).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grace Kelly.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support good! -- 320td (talk) 11:47, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Semnopithecus dussumieri

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Semnopithecus dussumieri (Southern plains gray langur).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose needs a gallery. พ.s. 06:53, 18 January 2012 (UTC) Has a gallery now (Merci Yann). พ.s. 20:55, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
  • A gallery is not a requisitive for a valued image. However you are free to make one. Please do not change the nomination, and please remove your opposition. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:46, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
    • You are not listening, aren't you? Shall I translate it in french? พ.s. 08:53, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
      • Please read Commons:Valued image criteria. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
        • Une galerie assure l'indication automatique d'un VI (VI icône est mis là par le BOT), une catégorie n'a pas cet avantage. Création d'une galerie—comme sont tous les autres préparatifs pour une candidature—sont la responsabilité du nominateur. OK now? พ.s. 09:05, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
          • This is NOT in the criterias. See my link above. Yann (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
            • It is common sense. Anything against common sense? พ.s. 09:11, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment A gallery is very useful. It is strongly advised to do so. We are all volunteers. we will not create a movement-friendly Gallery, if we sanction their absence. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:21, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment An inital message to W.S., which matches the rudeness in his opposing vote and provocing translation to French. Your oppose reason is invalid and RTFM! That said : Making a gallery makes life easier for User:VICbot in case of promotion as when there is not a gallery of a name matching the scope it ends up in Commons:Valued image candidates/tag galleries, which needs human attention and that page is terribly backlogged. If criteria should be adjusted (and maybe they should), please bring it to the talk page for discussion and do not target a specific nomination to make a point. --Slaunger (talk) 10:52, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
  • You should get your facts straight before lambasting! I first added the english name to the nom, italicizing the scientific name, not opposing and requesting a gallery [1]. In my book that is being constructive. This was rudely reverted. Then the only way to get through to Yann was opposing. That's my prerogative. I even took the trouble to translate my reasons in french, which apparently is not appreciated neither :-((. พ.s. 11:22, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I was not aware of that page history and the revert. Thanks for pointing that out. But regarding the translation to French, you and I both know Yann is good at understanding English and that it was unneeded. --Slaunger (talk) 11:38, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
  • This is at least a good reason for the gallery to exist before the promotion. So I created one. And this should be mentioned in the criterias. Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support--Jebulon (talk) 18:06, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Peugeot Satelis

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peugeot Satelis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion --Dr.Haus (talk) 18:41, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope; meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 14:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Requirements have met. --Katarighe (Talk) 17:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Dr.Haus (talk) 22:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Royal Enfield Bullet 350

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Royal Enfield Bullet 350.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info I have another image (File:Enfield Bullet 350, Kathgodam, Uttarakhand, India.jpg). These are the only 2 pictures which are geocoded. Yann (talk) 12:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Nephila pilipes

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Nephila pilipes (Giant Wood Spider), female.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Nephila pilipes (Giant Wood Spider), female.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Madhuca longifolia, leaves

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madhuca longifolia, leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Madhuca longifolia

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madhuca longifolia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Mangifera indica, flowers

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mangifera indica, flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support good quality best in rich scope.

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Mont Tondu

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mont Tondu.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Mont Tondu 2.jpg: +0
2. Mont-Blanc, Mont Tondu, Aiguille des Glaciers.jpg: +1 
3. Mont Tondu.jpg: +0 
=>
File:Mont Tondu 2.jpg: Declined.
File:Mont-Blanc, Mont Tondu, Aiguille des Glaciers.jpg: Promoted.
File:Mont Tondu.jpg: Declined.

--MrPanyGoff 21:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Refuge des Aiguilles d'Arves

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Refuge des Aiguilles d'Arves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support It is informative good quality photo. I also accept the scope though I cannot see articles at all. All three links you submit are just stubs, even the french one.--MrPanyGoff 08:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Boselaphus tragocamelus

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boselaphus tragocamelus (Nilgai), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support For now this is the best image of Commons for this scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Geronimo

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chief Geronimo, Apache leader.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope, portrays him as a warrior chief rather than the stereotype of the "noble savage" shown in the photos from late in his life. cmadler (talk) 13:57, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe I'm wrong, but Geronimo looks like this in my mind.--Jebulon (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment It is too pity that some sham photograph of Geronimo while was a circus-man will be a VI. It seems that the rifle is a very attractive attribute.--MrPanyGoff 20:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Chief Geronimo I.jpg: +0
2. GeronimoRinehart.jpg: +0 
3. Geronimo (Guiyatle), Apache.jpg: +0 
4. Geronimo (Goyathlay), a Chiricahua Apache, full-length, kneeling with rifle, 1887 - NARA - 530880.tif: +0 
5. Geronimo (Goyathlay), a Chiricahua Apache, full-length, kneeling with rifle, 1887 - NARA - 530880.jpg: +3
=>
File:Chief Geronimo I.jpg: Declined.
File:GeronimoRinehart.jpg: Declined.
File:Geronimo (Guiyatle), Apache.jpg: Declined.
File:Geronimo (Goyathlay), a Chiricahua Apache, full-length, kneeling with rifle, 1887 - NARA - 530880.tif: Declined.
File:Geronimo (Goyathlay), a Chiricahua Apache, full-length, kneeling with rifle, 1887 - NARA - 530880.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 20:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Harrison Ford

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harrison Ford.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support this one though I would prefer something like this, alas it is too small.--MrPanyGoff 20:04, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:08, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Bhojpur temple, interior

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bhojpur temple, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Gyps indicus

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gyps indicus (Indian Vulture).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I long hesitated which one to nominate. I think this one is the best: head of both adults and juvenile are clearly visible. Yann (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Both sides of the birds, too, is very rare. you were wrong to hesitate. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Bhojpur temple, exterior

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bhojpur temple, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Temple of Bhojpur, MP.jpg: +1
2. Bhojpur Mandir.jpg: +0 
3. Temple of Bhojpur.jpg: +0 
=>
File:Temple of Bhojpur, MP.jpg: Promoted.
File:Bhojpur Mandir.jpg: Declined.
File:Temple of Bhojpur.jpg: Declined.

--MrPanyGoff 19:30, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Diego de Alvear

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diego de Alvear, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose I think the technical quality for this image is not enough. The color is oversaturated and the image as a whole is too dark. His hair almost fades into the background, his shoulders do fade into the background, there is no way to see his arms against his torso, and the lapel is just a big bright red blob. cmadler (talk) 18:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
  • I reverted the changes which, I agree with you, do not improve the image. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
    •  Support With the reversion, this image is now the best in scope. cmadler (talk) 12:49, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Diego de Alvear.jpg: -1
2. Diego de Alvear y Ponce de León.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Diego de Alvear.jpg: Declined.
File:Diego de Alvear y Ponce de León.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 20:16, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

VMZ-5298 trolleybuses

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
VMZ-5298 trolleybuses.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

 Support This one is better. --Bgag (talk) 21:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Vidnoe LenKomsomola Street - Trolley04.jpg: +0
2. Miass-118-2.jpg: +2 
=>
File:Vidnoe LenKomsomola Street - Trolley04.jpg: Declined.
File:Miass-118-2.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 20:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Son River (upper course)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Son River (upper course).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Since the rivers are very extended objects, in my view the river scopes should be formulated as „Son River (upper course)”, „Son River (middle course)”, „Son River (lower course)”. In addition can be added scope names for some characteristic places for example: „Danube river at Budapest”, „Arno river at Florence”, „Son river at Dehri” and so on. This is my opinion.--MrPanyGoff 10:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
  • OK, I added (upper course). Yann (talk) 11:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Now it is VI for me.--MrPanyGoff 12:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Ox-drawn carts in India (traditional)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ox-drawn carts in India (traditional).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Please review. Yann (talk) 11:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope, meets all criteria. I particularly note that this cart appears to be drawn by zebu using a withers yoke (lower bar is mostly for stability I think), which from what I can find, is characteristic of India. cmadler (talk) 12:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Plowing with oxen

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plowing with oxen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Scores:
1. Ploughing paddy field with oxen, Umaria district, MP, India.jpg: +1
2. Ploughing a paddy field with oxen, Umaria district, MP, India.jpg: 0
3. Ploughing a paddy field with oxen, Umaria district, Madhya Pradesh, India.jpg: 0
=>
File:Ploughing paddy field with oxen, Umaria district, MP, India.jpg: Promoted.
File:Ploughing a paddy field with oxen, Umaria district, MP, India.jpg: Declined.

File:Ploughing a paddy field with oxen, Umaria district, Madhya Pradesh, India.jpg: Declined.

Uma Bharti

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Uma Bharti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Roger Moore

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roger Moore.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I totally agree excellent choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:49, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Leonardo DiCaprio

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leonardo DiCaprio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:52, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Madhuri Dixit

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madhuri Dixit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope IMO. --JLPC (talk) 07:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Solange Fernex

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Solange Fernex.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Easily best in scope (only picture on Commons) and good EV for me. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Serge Gainsbourg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Serge Gainsbourg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Jairam Ramesh

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jairam Ramesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 20:45, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Karima Delli

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karima Delli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The caption of the image is very poor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

• Description completed. Yann (talk) 07:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:39, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

S. N. Subba Rao

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salem Nanjundaiah Subba Rao.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The caption of the image is very poor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

• Description completed. Yann (talk) 07:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:27, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Radha Bhatt

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Radha Bhatt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 11:31, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Salman Khan

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salman Khan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I prefer this one. Good expression. -- JDP90 (talk) 18:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Same opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 20:58, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Scores:

1. Salmanrampwalk.png: +2
2. Salman Khan BSE11.jpg: 0
=>
File:Salmanrampwalk.png: Promoted.
File:Salman Khan BSE11.jpg: Declined.

--Yann (talk) 09:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Mona Lisa

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mona Lisa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I agree, given the technical performance --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Better resolution and more importantly, better colors --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support The real Mona Lisa is yellow !--Jebulon (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think the Mona Lisa is THAT yellow It's yellowed varnish over paint, not yellow paint. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'd be happy to welcome you in Paris in order to check this together by ourselves in the Louvre some day...--Jebulon (talk) 00:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment We do not judge beyond color varnish. We have to say that this picture is consistent with reality. It is like the image shows. This image has the most value. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Mona Lisa, by Leonardo da Vinci, from C2RMF retouched.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Mona Lisa, by Leonardo da Vinci, from C2RMF natural color.jpg: -1
=>
File:Mona Lisa, by Leonardo da Vinci, from C2RMF retouched.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Mona Lisa, by Leonardo da Vinci, from C2RMF natural color.jpg: Declined.

--cmadler (talk) 17:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Raphaël Duflos

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raphaël Duflos, in stage costume.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Do you think File:Raphaël Duflos 1910.jpg is worth a MVR? Personally, I prefer him younger and in a costume.
  •  Comment Visible fingerprint.
•  Comment The scope is not suitable. If in stage costume I must say in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
  • OK, done. Yann (talk) 09:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Jean Jaurès

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean Jaurès.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Jean Coquelin

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean Coquelin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : spots and crop. --JLPC (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Good for me, but please add English description to the image. Halavar (talk) 17:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
• @Halavar: Done. Yann (talk) 18:52, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 21:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:00, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Madeleine Barjac

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madeleine Barjac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment a/ Madeleine Barjac : 1883-1974 (easy to find on the Web). b/ Jebulon (a lot) and I (a few) uploaded old photos during the last few months but we restored them a bit before. I think it would be nice (not for us but for Wikipedia) to do so with this picture, as well as with the six other ones (spots for all, crop for three of them, a fingerprint (easy to fix) and bigger problems imo for Jane Hading). I'll wait for other comments before declining them all. --JLPC (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

• I made a few basic correction to this from the postcard. Sorry, I can't really do more than that. Feel free to help. ;o) Usually we judge here not by what we could have, but by what we already have. Thanks for completing the article in WP. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:55, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I must agree with Yann. Of course, this image might be better like any other pictures, when you spend lots of time in postprocessing process. But this is not the Idea of Valued Images. This image met all 6 criteria, so it should get promotion. Halavar (talk) 17:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Paule Andral

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paule Andral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : spots and crop. --JLPC (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Good for me, but please add English description to the image. Halavar (talk) 17:39, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
• @Halavar: Done. Yann (talk) 18:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 21:22, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:00, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Marthe Brandès

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marthe Brandès.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : spots and crop.--JLPC (talk) 15:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

• • You asked for some help ? New file uploaded (although there's still some work to do)... Feel free to revert. --JLPC (talk) 16:51, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks, good for me. But personally, seeing the quality of the original, I won't do any more editing than the basic. It isn't worth the time. BTW I usually keep the raw Gimp file (XCF) if it is of any use for you. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:07, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Good for me, but please add English description to the image. Halavar (talk) 17:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
• @Halavar: Done. Yann (talk) 18:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 21:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Sandra Milovanoff

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sandra Milovanoff.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : spots. --JLPC (talk) 15:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good for me. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Georges Courteline

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Georges Courteline.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 21:41, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Maryse Hilsz

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maryse Hilsz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 21:41, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Romain Rolland

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romain Rolland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support all criteria met and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:33, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

George Sand

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
George Sand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Giuseppe Verdi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Giuseppe Verdi, photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Sorry, but I think Verdi.jpg is better.--XRay ^talk 10:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
• That's a painting, not a picture. Yann (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support With "photograph" in the scope: OK!--XRay ^talk 11:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I think, you should add "photograph" to the scope. Then, your image will get a promotion. I think it is hard to compare images with paintings, and scopes should be different to both. Halavar (talk) 11:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
• Initially, I thought otherwise, but you convinced me. Yann (talk) 11:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Great. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 12:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

André Michelin

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
André Michelin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 10:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 15:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Charles Nungesser

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charles Nungesser.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 15:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Paul Vaillant-Couturier

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Vaillant-Couturier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 22:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment "Aujourd'hui plus qu'hier, mais bien moins que demain"... You could provide a higher resolution picture from this source (see this, same date, same event, and probably same photographer...). But yours is the "best in scope " indeed... for the moment.--Jebulon (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:22, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Sikh man, portrait

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sikh man, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Do I need to add "portrait"? Yann (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment "portrait" is a good idea because you can not see the other 4 attributes Sikhs.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Question Are there a color code for the Sikh turban? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
  • There are special colors for some religious groups, not for ordinary people. Here he is just an ordinary Sikh man. Yann (talk) 19:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Why did you chose this one ? There are many others (by you) very good too. In what is this man more sikh than others ? Furthermore I'm tending to think that this kind of religious categorizations of human beeings is at least questionable...--Jebulon (talk) 01:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
    • It's the only FP of a Sikh man. Well, they choose themselves to have particular characteristics, which are well shown here: beard, turban. Yann (talk) 07:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
  • OK, I did not notice it was a FP. That's a good reason for a nomination here. Thanks for answer.--Jebulon (talk) 12:18, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Élie Reclus

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Élie Reclus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please add English description. Halavar (talk) 12:57, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Yann (talk) 13:28, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 13:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Élisée Reclus

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Élisée Reclus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

André Malraux, 1974

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
André Malraux, 1974.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Why not put the two images: one from 1933 and one from 1974. These two images are very important. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
• @Archaeodontosaurus: Two images? What do you mean? Yann (talk) 18:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps a set nomination?-Godot13 (talk) 02:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Then either: a picture with the scope "Malraux, 1974" and another image with the scope "Malraux, 1933." --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

• OK for the date. Yann (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

André Malraux, 1933

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
André Malraux, 1933.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful (personnellement je préfére celle ci) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Le bon exemple de la possibilité (la nécessité ?) d'avoir des domaines (scopes) assez larges, y compris pour des personnes. Les deux images sont excellentes, et encyclopédiquement très valables. Je soutiens.--Jebulon (talk) 16:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

John Ruskin, 1882

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of John Ruskin, 1882.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

John Ruskin, self portrait, 1861

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of John Ruskin, self portrait, 1861.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:35, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Gustave Doré

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gustave Doré, ca. 1855.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Marie Doro

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marie Doro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:15, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 21:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Sarah Bernhardt

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarah Bernhardt, photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. I thought long because she is very beautiful in this picture. But we do not recognize it immediately. She will forgive me this thought. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Southern Emu-wren

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stipiturus malachurus (Southern Emu-wren).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Hard to beat. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Édouard Manet by Félix Nadar

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Édouard Manet by Félix Nadar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Could be better, but the best with no doubt.--Jebulon (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Stephen Wootton Bushell

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stephen Wootton Bushell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Annie Besant

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Annie Besant.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Saqib (talk) 23:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Odette Dulac

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odette Dulac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : O.K. for Odette (imo), and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Ellen Baxone

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ellen Baxone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Yvonne Dubel

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yvonne Dubel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Jane Marnac

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jane Marnac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --LivioAndronico talk 15:40, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Luz Chavita

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Luz Chavita.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 16:19, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Georges Berr

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Georges Berr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

C. Hayden Coffin

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
C. Hayden Coffin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 21:11, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 22:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Élise de Vère

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Élise de Vère.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Macaca mulatta, female and juvenile

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macaca mulatta (Rhesus macaque), female and juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 07:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Cécile Sorel

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cécile Sorel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Geneviève Lantelme

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geneviève Lantelme.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --LivioAndronico talk 23:14, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Eva Nansen

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eva Nansen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --LivioAndronico talk 20:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Fridtjof Nansen

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fridtjof Nansen, 1890.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Albert Einstein

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albert Einstein, 1921.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful (even though I prefer the original tones). --JLPC (talk) 17:42, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Water buffalo calf suckling

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bubalus bubalis (Water buffalo suckling calves).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Small oversight: Bubalus bubalis(Water buffalo) would be a better scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

• OK, done. Yann (talk) 05:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Lalji Desai

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lalji Desai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Water buffalo calf

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bubalus bubalis (Water buffalo calves).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Small oversight: Bubalus bubalis (Water buffalo) would be a better scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • OK, done. Yann (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Usefull --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Water buffalo bull

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bubalus bubalis (Water buffalo), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Le Jardin de Nébamoun

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nebamun garden, fresco in the tomb of Nebamun.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Famous fresco from Ancient Egypt  Info Geolocation is for the British Museum, as the exact location of the tomb is actually lost. Yann (talk) 16:39, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Fisherman fresco

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fisherman fresco, Akrotiri, Greece.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Young boxers fresco

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boxing children fresco, Akrotiri, Greece.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I put the geocoding on the original location, not on the museum. Is it OK?

For the objects exhibited it is better to geocode the museum. It is useful to the two geocoding in the caption; if we know them. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Please note that the Museum geocoding is provided in the template. I inverted the 2 templates. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:33, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful (Nous ergotons car de toute façon c'est excellent)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

The Parisian, fresco

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Petite Parisienne (Knossos, main palace).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Image very useful, unique and highly representative of this famous fresco. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 17:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

La Dame de Mycènes

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mycenean lady from Knossos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Cueilleuse de safran

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saffron gatherers, Akrotiri, detail.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Fresque du printemps

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spring fresco, Akrotiri, Greece.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

The Abduction of Persephone by Pluto

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Abduction of Persephone by Pluto, Amphipolis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:55, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Gare SNCF, Annemasse

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway station, Annemasse, France, south-east façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Poste principale, Annemasse

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main post office, Annemasse, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Hôtel de Ville d'Annemasse

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Hall, Annemasse, France, south façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:00, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Hamsa jâtaka, Ajanta

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hamsa jâtaka, Ajanta, cave 17, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Bodhisattva Padmapani

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bodhisattva Padmapani, cave 1, Ajanta, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Some other images are bigger, but I think mine is better (sharper, truthful colors)
  • You're right (imho) :  Best in Scope.--JLPC (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

The Pharaon Tutankhamun destroying his enemis

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Pharaon Tutankhamun destroying his enemis, painting on wood, ca. 1327 BCE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Ship procession fresco, Akrotiri

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Ship procession fresco, Akrotiri, part 1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment No VIS any more, so I am proposing it here. Yann (talk) 20:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
• Please review. Yann (talk) 12:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 15:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ship procession fresco, Akrotiri, part 2.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ship procession fresco, Akrotiri, part 3.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ship procession fresco, Akrotiri, part 4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Sarcophagus of Agia Triada

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarcophagus of Agia Triada, north side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 17:12, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Tomb of Agios Athanasios

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Agios Athanasios, the Banquet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Hades abducting Persephone, Vergina

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hades abducting Persephone, Vergina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Hades and Persephone, Vergina

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hades and Persephone, Vergina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Dionysos on a cheetah, Pella

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dionysos mosaic, Pella.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Stag hunt mosaic, Pella

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stag hunt mosaic, Pella, Greece.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Femmes peucètes dansant

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peucetians women dancing, Tomb of Ruvo di Puglia, Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Danseurs et musiciens, tombe des léopards

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dancers and musicians, tomb of the leopards, Monterozzi necropolis, Tarquinia, Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Tomb of hunting and fishing, Monterozzi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of hunting and fishing, Monterozzi necropolis, Tarquinia, Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 15:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Still life with eggs, birds and bronze dishes, Pompeii

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Still life with eggs, birds and bronze dishes, House of Julia Felix, Pompeii..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 17:09, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Fresque des mytères, Pompéi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresco of the mystery ritual, right, Pompeii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I think scope:Fresco of the mystery ritual is too broad and general. --Halavar (talk) 19:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment There is no real name for each part of the fresco, and the interpretation is controversial. I completed the description. OK now? Yann (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Too complicated now... I think scope should be: "Fresco of the mystery ritual, Villa of the Mysteries, Pompeii, Italy." --Halavar (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is only a part of the fresco, which covers several walls. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I think Frescos of the mystery ritual satisfies COM:VISC. The category Category:Frescos of the mystery ritual has been stable since 2010. Halavar, why do you think it too broad and general? Villa of the Mysteries works for me also. The frescos seem to be its main feature of note. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Why? There might be hundreds of frescos of mystery rituals in the world. So we should specify, that we are talking about fresco of the mystery ritual in the Villa of the Mysteries in Pompeii. As I said: Quate: "I think scope should be: "Fresco of the mystery ritual, Villa of the Mysteries, Pompeii, Italy." I don't know, why Yann does not want to change scope to my proposal... --Halavar (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Category:Frescos of the mystery ritual satisfies the criterion of COM:VISC, to wit, "If you wish, you can make use of an existing category - or alternatively write your own scope." It is disambiguated similar to the manner you suggest by its parent category Category:Ancient Roman frescos in the Villa of the Mysteries (Pompeii). I try to defer to the nominator if possible and be mindful of Jebulon's comments.[2] Consequently, I'm reverting to the original scope and supporting that version.Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support (with "Pompei" added).[3] Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Nile Mosaic from Palestrina

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nile Mosaic from Palestrina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 11:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Sonakshi Sinha

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sonakshi Sinha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I have no doubt that this lady is already done and still do a long career, there should be the year in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

• I don't think the year is necessary here. IMO this is the best picture we have of her, whatever the time. I don't think we need subscopes for each year. We already have many VIC without a year, and I think that is appropriate. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

This is not false. We'll see in 10 years.  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:13, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 18:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Shraddha Kapoor

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shraddha Kapoor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Difficult choice. Other contenders might be: 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. Yann (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Message Publicity, Image directly paid by the trademark. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Watermark. — revi_msg 17:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Watermark removed by Archaeo. :) I don't think I'm experienced enough to review images (and I'm mobile now) — revi_msg 15:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Watermark canceled --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Images} 13:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Libération de Celio Vibenna, tombe François

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liberation of Caelius Vibenna, tomb of François, Ponte Rotto, Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 11:28, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Persée et Andromède, Boscotrecase

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perseus and Andromeda, Boscotrecase, Italy. Exposed in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Lingam, Neelkanth temple

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neelkanth temple, Alwar district, Rajasthan, India, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Exterior, Neelkanth temple

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neelkanth temple, Alwar district, Rajasthan, India, exterior, south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Jain statue, Naugaza temple

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jain statue, Naugaza temple, Alwar district, Rajasthan, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:06, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Flag of India

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Photographs of the national flag of India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

People smoking the hookah

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
People smoking the hookah, colour photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : the scope is too broad imo : there are drawings in the category, and B&W photographs ; maybe you should add : "colour photograph". --JLPC (talk) 17:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

• OK fine. Yann (talk) 12:08, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Marble quarries, Jaipur

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marble quarries, Jaipur, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Flag of Geneva

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flags of Geneva, photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Panoramics from the Semnoz, east

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics from the Semnoz, east view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Baudelaire, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, Baudelaire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Studio work, so no geocoding. Yann (talk) 17:07, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:25, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Georges Brassens

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Georges Brassens, 1966.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info I put the geolocation at the Théâtre de Suresnes Jean Vilar, as that where was the Théâtre national populaire in 1966, accoding to WP.

•  Support best un scope et... que de Sètois ici! il ne manquait plus que moi! Jean Vilar est meme un cousin à moi. :) -- ChristianFerrer 21:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Phobos

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phobos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Abbaye de Bonnecombe

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbaye de Bonnecombe, aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 Support Very useful. Nev1 (talk) 15:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Katrina Kaif

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katrina Kaif.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment This seems the image most used on Wikipedia for her. I hesitate with File:Katrina Kaif Launches Lakme Sun Expert New Product 04.jpg. Tell me if you think it is worth a MVR (although I can't find the location).

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Priyanka Chopra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Scope very rich, I trust you're connoisseur. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Deepika Padukone

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deepika Padukone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Geocoding needed a long search, but I got it! Yann (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Paintings of Ganesha

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paintings of Ganesha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:15, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Info Since the freedom of panorama doesn't cover 2D art in India, we don't have many high resolution and good quality reproductions of paintings of Ganesh. This one is anonymous folk art, and free of copyright. It is from the early 1950s, so it would be in the public domain anyway. I think that the only other contender is File:Peinture murale (Palais du Fort Meherangarh, Jodhpur) (8418402841).jpg, which is from the 18th century.

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)