User talk:Yann/archives 14

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Crafts Museum text

Dear Yann, I am grateful for the wonderful photos you clicked of the Crafts Museum. I hope to see more in the future. We are still in the process of filing an OTRS ticket but here is the possible text you could use: "This image is a part of the GLAM collaboration between the Crafts Museum, New Delhi and Wikimedia community in India. Under this collaboration the Crafts Museum, New Delhi has permitted photography and release of its images under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and/or other free licenses in the public domain." Merci beaucoup, Yann :) A bientot! Noopur28 (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Combat de cornes dans les coins

Salut.

Merci pour tes récents supports de mes images.

Félicitations pour ta série indienne en QIC, passionnante et bien jolie.

Chapeau surtout pour ton combat ~~de bœufs~~d' antilopes, que j'ai soutenu en FPC. However, comme y disent, il y a un petit problème à régler. En redressant ton image, tu as laissé un petit "blanc" bien visible dans le coin en haut à gauche, qui nuit à la perfection de l'ensemble. Un léger clonage, ou un "crop", devrait y remédier.

Enfin bref, tu sais ce que tu as à faire.

Amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 14:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merci, tu as l'œil ! Mais ce ne sont pas des bœufs, mais des antilopes, tss, tss ! ;o) Yann (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Allons bon, j'ai l'air malin !! Dis donc, c'est chaud, chez les antilopes ! Bref, y'a quand même du blanc...--Jebulon (talk) 15:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oui, elles sont apprivoisées, et elles me suivaient partout après que je leur ai donné à manger. Elles voulaient presque monter dans la voiture !... Mais il ne vaut mieux pas rester au milieu quand elles se bâtent. J'ai recoupé l'image. Ça va maintenant ? Yann (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

yes.--Jebulon (talk) 16:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks

Thanks. I love your images.--Miguel Bugallo 22:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scope changed for Morgan Pressel photograph

Scope changed from Morgan Pressel (Portrait) to Morgan Pressel at Pro-Am tournament --Yjenith (talk) 09:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Morgan_Pressel_-_Flickr_-_Keith_Allison_(26).jpg scope changed for your review

Scope changed from Morgan Pressel tee shot to Morgan Pressel --Yjenith (talk) 16:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Bougainvillea

Both these files would benefit froma levels adjust. I tried it and the colourful tree really popped out. Just a thought, nice work on this and the Taj. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your message. You mean, more blue? Yann (talk) 04:14, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have an email.

Please read your emails, Thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:54, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Review?

Hello, cxan you please give a review at my talk page? Thanks. Dipankan001 (talk) 05:14, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cervus elaphus (réponse)

Un gran merci ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Distortion

Hello Yann, you promoted this painting and at the same time suggested to improve the distortion. I have uploaded a new version with the target to fix that problem, please, have a look and let me know. Thanks for everything and happy Eastern! --Poco a poco (talk) 06:56, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jaune, et Jaune

Salut Yann,

Pardon d'avoir pris tant de temps à te répondre.

Saint-Eustache: il s'agit d'une lumière parfaitement naturelle, due au soleil couchant d'hiver. cette photo est particulièrement remarquable du fait que la pierre prend dans ces conditions un teinte superbe, rare, et à vrai dire seulement perceptible en automne ou en hiver. J'ai ainsi eu la chance de pouvoir saisir Saint-Louis des Invalides presque rose, et je peux te garantir que ça n'a duré que quelques minutes à peine. Autre exemple, la coupole de Saint-Augustin, qui est bien plus triste à d'autres heures de la journée. J'ai donc souhaité promouvoir la photo de Moonik pour cette qualité-là, avoir su saisir une lumière inhabituelle (mais naturelle) au bon moment (souvent très court).

Le sarcophage d'enfant: je commence à connaître la question, nombre de mes photos récentes de la crypte des Habsbourg à Vienne ayant été passées au crible du filtre QI. Ici, nous sommes en présence d'un sarcophage d'enfant en albâtre, donc blanc, par simple éthymologie. Un réglage préalable de l'appareil photo aurait permis de corriger (ou au moins d'atténuer) ce que la lumière (ici artificielle) avait de jaunasse, sans compter un léger travail de désaturation des jaunes, et peut être de renforcement des bleus, à l'aide de logiciels de post traitement, le cas échéant. J'ajoute que d'autres ont parfaitement réussi, sur le même objet, à éviter cet écueil, (même si la photo n'est pas bonne globalement). L'argument du "flash" ne tient évidemment pas, et sent le combat d'arrière-garde...

Ma conclusion, c'est que nous avons d'un côté une volonté délibérée d'obtenir un effet inhabituel et "beau", en lumière naturelle, et de l'autre, un cliché pris rapidement, sans le soin préalable qu'exige une telle prise de vue en environnement difficile, avec donc des défauts "subis" et non gérés.

J'espère que mes explications t'auront satisfait, ou au moins fait comprendre ma position.

Par ailleurs, je suis vraiment désolé pour ta belle princesse en sari bleu, mais vraiment, ce trait sombre le long de sa jolie silhouette me paraît rédhibitoire. N'y vois bien sûr aucune animosité particulière, j'essaie d'être sincère. C'est difficile, tant on voit d'assez vilaines (ou en tous cas médiocres) choses promues par conformisme, cette dernière remarque ne concernant à l'évidence ni tes images, ni tes jugements, qui me sont si souvent et si gentiment favorables !

Bien cordialement à toi,

--Jebulon (talk) 14:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Issue fixed on Commons Archive

Hi Yann, just wanted to let you know I fixed the issue that was preventing your additional SR2 uploads on Commons Archive (in the end I just disabled TIFFHandler, which is not fond of almost-TIFF formats like SR2). Please feel free to upload a few more files - I've been uploading some more NEFs. I also moved from S3 storage to EBS storage and did other performance tuning, which should make it much more responsive. Dcoetzee (talk) 17:34, 14 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply if you can

You have one reply in Commons:Valued image candidates/George Maharis 1975.jpg. Please respond if you can. --George Ho (talk) 06:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, wait... Can you change your rationale and vote? I have changed the scoop. --George Ho (talk) 11:30, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images from Digitalt Museum, Norway

You have tagged one of my uploads with missing permission. The file has a link to the source, where the license is stated (cc-by-sa-3.0). The museum has a page where they inform more about licensing, see [1]. I have removed the missing permission-tag, but if you think there still are some problems with the image, I suggest you nominate it for deletion (which would affect most of the images in Category:Media from the collection of Oslo Museum and Category:Images from Digitalt Museum, Norway). Best regards - 4ing (talk) 13:59, 26 April 2012 (UTC).Reply[reply]

	Hello, Yann. You have new messages at Commons:Batch uploading/Works of Maurice Ravel. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

FP candidate File:Durga, Burdwan, 2011.JPG

Does this FP candidate Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Durga, Burdwan, 2011.JPG violates copyright on commons? Please see discussion on its nomination page. There are so many images of durga idol there in commons for many years. This is a QI and VI. I am asking you because you have supported the image for FP. You also supported the image for becoming QI and you are an administrator on commons. What is your thought about this? Thanks in advance. -- Joydeep (talk) 16:02, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

camera quality

Hi Yann, thanks for the feedback re the bracelet. That particular image was heavily cropped, in poor light (indoors in a museum that didn't allow flash) and without using the tripod. File:Vani belt (inside view of stag).JPG is a photo taken with the same camera in the same lighting but uncropped, and File:Lady with Pearl.JPG is an uncropped photo taken outdoors with the same camera - probably with the tripod. Do you think it would be technically possible to take a quality image with that camera? Jonathan Cardy (talk) 16:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think it is difficult. Images from cheap cameras have a lot of noise, and are not sharp. There are suitable for Web uses, but the quality is too low for QI. You can still get valued images with your camera as the quality standard is much lower. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Eiffel tower and the seine at night.jpg

Hi Yann. Can you tell me what you mean by "no copyright on ordinary light"? I can't understand this phrasing. Tomer T (talk) 20:04, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There can't be a copyright on simple lightning. See Platonides' comment. Plus in this case, it is a general view, which means that an unavoidable copyrighted element in a larger view is allowed. The Place des Terreaux court case: Commons:De minimis#An example under Civil Law, [2]. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated

Hi, the following 2 files were flagged stating its missing its source. I am confused as in the source I put Own work as I took both of these photographs myself.

File source is not properly indicated: File:CF Firefight.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:MP Patrol SUV (Chevrolet Tahoe).jpg

Please advise, thanks. DarkKomodo (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yann, I wrote back to your response on my board, please see there. Thanks DarkKomodo (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Onions

Pehaps you too can help here: User talk:Alchemist-hp#Onions. Thanks in advance. Colin (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

copyright of my pictures

Hi! I'm very confused about all the messages I have just read. I haven't noticed all these copyright infringment before today, and I'm sorry about that. I have uploaded several files since a few days, and I had never seen any message. These pictures are the property of the company in which I currently work. What should I change in the pictures' description to fix this problem?

Nightmare31 (talk) 14:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour, je constate que je n'ai toujours pas eu de réponse. Je ne veux pas paraître désagréable ou pressé, mais j'aimerais pouvoir rajouter les photos sur mes articles avant de me pencher sur d'autres travaux.

Bonne continuation ! Nightmare31 (talk) 12:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

creative commons

I am trying to find someone who would be online right now. Would this be a acceptable Creative Commons licensing. Jhenderson777 (talk) 15:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Civil or not - that is the question

Please clarify what here is not civil. Is it civil to knock s.o. because he posts anonymous? Your revert is nothing else than censorship. Think about it and have a nice evening. --84.174.246.61 19:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Taj Mahal, Agra, India edit2.jpg

Yann, we received an OTRS email about this image. Apparently someone else has submitted it to a Qatar Airways contest as their own work although you have licensed the image as CC-BY-SA. The submission is at [3]. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The email only informed us that the sender found the image on this link as a user submission. Apparently, Qatar airways gains copyright of all user submissions. Sender informed us that he sent a message to Qatar Airways saying that the image is not from the uploader, but rather one from a Wikipedia editor. I've informed the sender about this conversation. If you wish I can ask the sender to contact you directly using the "E-mail this user" function, but I'm not sure that the sender knows anything more either, he just happened to see it and recognized the image as one used on Wikipedia. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 17:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

小倉優子.jpg

Hi, I opened Commons:Deletion requests/File:小倉優子.jpg; in retrospect, I probably should have speedied it as a copyvio; I'm not sure it would be appropriate for me to do that now, since I've already opened it as a deletion request. Since I see you've previously commented to the user about copyvios, I thought I'd bring it to your attention. TJRC (talk) 20:58, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, you could have speedied it as copyvio. It does not matter now, as I deleted it. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Sinopskiy Battle on the 18th November of the 1853 year (Night after Battle)

Scope changed and description updated. Best regards. Angelus^(talk) 22:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Peacock.jpg

A while back (almost a year!) you closed a deletion discussion on this picture and reverted to an older version. Something however seems to have been messed up with the licensing info and I can't figure out what actually happened at the time. Can you take a look? Thx. --Harthacnut (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I don't see what messed up. Can you explain? Yann (talk) 11:23, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Permision Hosman

It is my work, look the svg version.Asybaris01 (talk) 20:37, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, please add a link to the SVG version, like I did. Yann (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merci !

Merci ! Je suis très touché par tes félicitations. Je n'ai pas du tout la prétention de faire aussi bien que certains contributeurs qui sont mieux équipés et bien plus talentueux que moi pour ce genre de chose. Cordialement. --M0tty (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Card puncher - NARA - 513295.jpg date

Hello. Why did you caption File:Card puncher - NARA - 513295.jpg as "circa 1890? Please comment at File talk:Card puncher - NARA - 513295.jpg. Thank you much. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Klara Hitler.jpg

Hi! I wanted to inform you that a user continues to load a file version that is clearly overexposed! The face is disproportionately white and the whole image loses definition. I tried to warn the user not to overwrite the image, but the user continues to load the image edited, despite warnings. Thanks a lot and best regards. --Angelus^(talk) 08:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! :-) --Angelus^(talk) 15:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright

Bonjour Yann. J'ai envoyé un mail à OTRS il y a un peu plus d'une semaine, concernant les images que j'avais posté sur différents articles. Je n'ai pas encore eu de retour. Je ne sais pas si je dois m'adresser à toi ou bien à une autre personne, mais j'attends depuis plusieurs jours que mes images soient acceptées.

--Nightmare31 (talk) 12:33, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Je n'ai pas acces a OTRS. Desole, Yann (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merci quand même. Bonne continuation.

--Nightmare31 (talk) 10:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

":" and French

Hi Yann. Is it true that there should be always a (non-breaking) space before ":", in French (like Template:fr for instance)? Cheers. --Angelus^(talk) 11:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, that's true. Yann (talk) 13:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! :-) --Angelus^(talk) 13:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Taj Mahal

Hi, I will be going to Agra soon. Can you pleas let me know what time this was taken? --Muhammad (talk) 18:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the morning around 10 a.m. Good luck for your pictures! Yann (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks :) --Muhammad (talk) 13:05, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AnthonyWong08TIFF.jpg

Geocoding is added. --George Ho (talk) 04:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Valued image candidates/AnthonyWong08TIFF.jpg; do you still have time? --George Ho (talk) 07:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

valued images

Hi, is it necessary for image that it should link to files or used by other wikis before valued image nomination ?? 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS (talk) 08:19, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help needed

Hi, is there a way to find out the Date of upload of an image to a website. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:38, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heads up!

A new reply has been posted: here --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 11:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hi

I want to ask a question!. In the upload wizard in this site wikimedia commons, it says if you upload your picture someone could use and sale it! how it's possible without even permission. commons for share alike this is what i know. could you reply me please!--Neogeolegend (talk) 10:35, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source des image

C'est assez long pour mettre une source valide pour mes images pouvez-vous m'aider. Merci.

- J'ai commencé. Maintenat je mets directement le lien en source. Merci de vos conseils.

Numéro 1963 Discution

Licesning derivative work

Hi there, you left me a message here. Please see my comment RE: Licesning derivative work --Thuvack (talk) 06:48, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Picture

just curious about why you deleted the loki ad scarlet witch picture? how was that against copyright? i thought using panels from comics was allowed if it helped depict a scene or image that text couldnt? 174.254.240.188 23:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grand pictures edit war - Steinway marketing (white? grey? black?) in the german WP

Hi Yann, I do not stand to re-discuss the deletion of the Bechstein concert grand harp.. But I'd like to inform you that same nick "hereiamfriends" was active in the german wikipedia and tried to replace pictures of other grands by pictures of Steinway grands, mostly without real use for the Wikipedia article but to be enabled to promote the Steinway brand in the picture description line down.. He was not the only one, there was/is a group of short-term users acting. If interested see version history of de:Flügel (Tasteninstrument). Edit wars about replacing of photographs, and deleting "other" pics being part of this edit war. They abused your deletion service - my opinion. It was not up to "hereiamfriends" to claim deletion, there was to my knowledge no Bechstein complaint about copyright abuse.

I don't know if this is officially done with consent or activity of the Steinway company - or if we face a plot of guerilla marketing. Just for your information. BTW 1 do we have another aerial view of a concert grand harp? Should I try to obtain the consent of the Bechstein company? It was "utterly powerful arguing" of a "Steinway man" (assumed) that to use a Bechstein photograph without written consent were illegal.. BTW 2 I am no "Bechstein man" but a happy owner of a Steinway grand and a contributor to a lot of Steinway stuff here. This "Steinway PR" stinks. My 0.02 Euro Cents. Best regards -- de:User:AxelKing (in the DE and EN WP)

VOA images deleted

Can you please tag them for discussion before you use the copyvio tag, many of them were made by VOA reporters, and should not have been deleted as far as I know. I would prefer to discuss them first rather than having to go through the whole un-delete procedure on Commons.... Oaktree b (talk) 02:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

televes

hi Why you have deleted this photo?

(act · ant) 06:39 13 jun 2012‎ CommonsDelinker (discusión · contribuciones)‎ m . . (3.190 bytes) (-83)‎ . . (Bot: Eliminando "Televes-compostela-spain.jpg". Borrado en Commons por Yann. (License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works)) (deshacer)

http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Telev%C3%A9s&action=history

Images removed...Why?

Hi Yann, I've found that you removed more than 10 images that I've uploaded. I don't understand why...I've added resources specially for the topographic maps. they are original from Nasa. I just added arabic translations & hints. Is there any problem with this. Please, Solve. I've tried to upload them again but failed due to archives! --Kamal Elgazzar (talk) 22:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Yann, I took those maps from a book written by Farouk ElBaz. He mentioned that he worked on those maps while his work for NASA 20 year ago & I wrote the resource while I'm uploading the photoes..... So, the they are original work from NASA! The other edits I did were by Archmap software. Please, Tell me if you ask for any?! Bye --Kamal Elgazzar (talk) 08:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Napoleon_100

I noticed that you deleted images by this user tagged by me. There are more such images uploaded. Not checked all images. Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Napoleon_100. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Those tagged were deleted. I could not find others. Yann (talk) 05:41, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK. I had not tagged all. will go through his uploads and tag more. Can you explain the user the necessary policy, before he doesn't upload more like these? --Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Check for copyright violation

A user has recently uploaded a few images on the Commons that could possibly be copyrighted. I was wondering if you could check and remove such images uploaded by the user. This is the link for the images to be checked. 117.198.106.253 19:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Demande d'aide pour l'upload, stp

Bonsoir Yann,

J'ai bien essayé d'uploader mes fichiers de dictionnaires en utilisant l'option "Chunked uploads" que tu m'as indiquée sur le Bistro, mais en vain... ça tourne à vide, et sans indication d'avancement du travail.

Les deux seuls fichiers que j'ai réussi à télécharger (sans l'option, avec ça ne passait pas) sont File:Moréri - Grand dictionnaire historique - 1759 - vol. 3.djvu et File:Moréri - Grand dictionnaire historique - 1759 - vol. 8.djvu qui sont juste sous la limite des 100 Mo.

Pourrais-tu, stp, m'aider à récupérer (ou récupérer pour moi) les 8 autres volumes (malgré le nom du lien, il y a un fichier djvu, j'ai eu un pb à l'import sur IA) - en utilisant le nommage déjà utilisé si possible :

Si tu préfères partir des fichiers Gallica, les références sont ici

Je suis sous Mac et je ne dispose pas des outils permettant de compresser ou réduire la taille des images ou des fichiers djvu (non plus que d'éliminer les marges).

Tu m'avais bien aidée sur mon tout premier import, et il paraît que les administrateurs ont des outils pour outrepasser la limite de 100 Mo, c'est pourquoi je me permets de te solliciter directement.

J'ai demandé à Zyeph sur IRC, mais il m'a dit qu'il ne savait pas trop comment traiter les "gros fichiers"...

Merci donc si tu peux m'aider, et de lui signaler pour éviter que vous travailliez en même temps sur la même chose

Très cordialement, --Hsarrazin (talk) 19:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Désolé

Salut Yann, je suis désolé pour ce diff [4] pas très gentil. Je vais passer mon opposition en neutre pour deux raisons, 1 y a pas à revenir sur cette DR, 2 je ne suis pas pour car je trouve que par courtoisie (là on ne parle plus de loi ou de suppression) le photographe doit être cité. Bref j'ai réagi trop vivement sur un sujet qui me tient à coeur, et du coup je confonds ce que moi j'estime nécessaire et ce que l'on (en tant que communauté) accepte sur Commons. Et sinon merci pour tout le boulot que tu fais. --PierreSelim (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scope changed in Commons:Valued image candidates/Philaeus chrysops podgorje 01.jpg

I have changed the scope. Since you voted oppose, you may change if necessary. --George Ho (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images created by me

Hello Yann, I uploaded 3 images that have been created by me on Photoshop. I don't understand why you state that they are copyright violations. (Lemon-pie-receta.png/Página de calendario.png/Tiramisu-receta.png).

Thanks User:Anikurson

Hello again, Yann,

For a subject I have at university (last year student of Translation and Interpreting), I had to choose an article in English and translate it, or adapt it, to Spanish. The original article already had one image (Digital Scrapbooking), but I thought it would be better to add some more as examples of this art. Since it's been a long time I do this as a hobbie, I thought about adding some of my own and some others which have been downloaded from websites with Scrapbooking material I use (I don't have a record of each website so I don't know exactly where I got each file, there are too many).

So basically I have two types of image: my own creations and images showing what a "Scrapbooking" set of materials look like. How do you suggest I could fix this problem?

Thank you a lot User:Anikurson

Restored image

You can click on the original tif and see the fully restored jpg. They are my first uploads in this category. Suggestions is clear, Done means restored and Completed means they have become a featured picture. Thank you for explaining my mistake. --Hrald (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Plus

I meant to put this link at the VP. If you are looking at buying Nikon you may find some of the reviews etc there useful - I did. Bear in mind he is biased towards Nikon however there is a lot of info there - both on bodies and lenses. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

VI

Y a t il un problème en VI? Je n'ai pas compris ta dernière intervention...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Non, c'est une erreur. Désolé. Yann (talk) 13:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Je m'en suis douté :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

??

I guess this revert needs an explanation. --Leyo 13:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

C'est une erreur. Désolé. Yann (talk) 13:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What about these, reverts? You seem to misclick quite often. --Leyo 09:06, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rolandhelper

He's been blocked on English Wikipedia for block evasion, so you might want to keep an eye out for IPs similar to those seen in the sockpuppet investigation for him. Σ (talk) 22:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright violation of my image

I uploaded an image. But it has copyright violations. Then what can I do for that image ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikian (talk • contribs)

Deletion of pictures

why do you delete my pictures? licensing is in progress! And I have one week to do this! (See [Ticket#2012062710006777] Lizenz für Bilder des KSC, user Mlowin ) Please undelete the pictures! --Mlowin (talk) 17:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Shin Won Ho

You deleted the picture of Shin Won Ho, why! My friggin GOD, I spent like 4 hours figuring it all friggin out, and you just decide to flipping delete it. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ these are the rules. http://www.hancinema.net/shin-won-ho-exchanges-souls-with-gong-yoo-in-big-41814.html it is added at the bottom of the friggin article. Put the picture back up

Please note that the above hancinema.net link cites its source to this article on Nate, a commercial South Korean website that copyrights all of its content. — ξ ^xplicit 01:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Restub

Hi Yann, please explain why you deleted image off Edmund Arthur Harvey's wiki? This image was crucial in showing how he was influenced by Arthur Murch who is an Archibald Prize winner and an important Australian War Artist. I would appreciate a proper explanation for your action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Restub (talk • contribs)

This file is a copyright violation of the artist painting, as all other images of his paintings. Yann (talk) 06:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Superphénix

Salut Yann,
Juste pour te signaler que quelqu'un a posé sur Wikipédia une question qui concerne notamment quelques-unes de tes photos, si ça te dit de répondre : fr:Wikipédia:Le Bistro multimédia/semaine 26 2012#licence des photos de superphénix. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, merci pour l'info. Yann (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Panoramalogo.png

Sorry, but I'm the one who climbed the image File: Panoramalogo.png, You can check it, I would like the subi eliminated because a better version: File:LogodePanorama.png Thank you. --George Miquilena (talk) 18:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images remarquables

Bonjour !

Je suis désolé mais mes images répondent aux critères. A moins que les images n&b soient refusées mais je ne l'est pas vue ! Les critiques faites à mes images sont faussent et infondés et ça m'agace de voir que les non-possesseurs de reflex sont systématiquement sur le carreau. Tout les utilisateurs de commons ne pensent qu'à rabaissé et critiquer négativement mes images et cela commence à m'énerver ! Sincèrement Bourgeois.A (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour ! J'ai fait les modifs nécessaires (normalement), mais il n'y a pas moyen de recommencer les votes à zéro ou de signalé au contributeurs que les conditions ont changé ? je m'excuse de m'être énervé, mais j’étaie très remonté hier, en voyant l’accueille glaciale faite à mes images. J'ai tellement envie que mes images est une "reconnaissance" sur Commons ! Bourgeois.A (talk) 09:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Phul phutuk.ogg

You have a new message at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Phul_phutuk.ogg --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 11:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yann: Note: Commons:Help_desk#Impossible_to_delete_own_files_in_Commons.3F. Cheers --Saibo (Δ ∇) 23:10, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks

I understand your point, to have a DSLR used could be a good way... --The Photographer (talk) 13:24, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Inequality-by-Kenworthy.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Inequality-by-Kenworthy.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:11, 2 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikisource Facebook page

Hi Yann,

Are you by chance the admin of the inactive Wikisource Facebook page? Or do you know who is? We are discussing Facebook possibilities at the English Scriptorium, and it would be nice to get those 400-odd fans merged into the new FB page. Also, if you have any ideas to add to the discussion, they would be welcome. Thanks, --Eliyak (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Aminetou Mandela.jpg

Hello Yann, I dont understand the reasons for deleting File:Aminetou Mandela.jpg. The source (Aminetu Haidar in Nelson Mandela cell in Robben Island prison) had a CC BY-SA 2.0 license as many other files in WP, so where's the copyright violation?. Regards,--HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:46, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Suppression abusive et erronée d'un fichier.

Le fichier File:Affiche Carnaval de Paris 1994.jpg que tu as supprimé figurant l'affiche pour le Carnaval de Paris 1994 est une aquarelle que j'ai créée moi-même, pour une association que je préside et que j'ai librement choisi de mettre sur la base en licence libre Commons. Je te demande de bien vouloir la remettre dans Commons. Cette suppression n'a pas lieu d'être, étant donné que je suis le détenteur des droits d'auteur de cette œuvre et ai choisi de la mettre sur la base Commons. Merci de bien vouloir effectuer cette restauration. Cordialement. Basili (discuter) 16:56, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Виктория Булитко БУЛИТКА.jpg, copyright violation?

Hi Yann, I dont understand the reasons for deleting File:Виктория Булитко БУЛИТКА.jpg. This photo made and post-production by myself. Also I have full rights and permission from actress for this photo. What is the problem with the copyright violation?

Can you please undelete this file? Or explain to me the detailed explanation of problem here and what to do to avoid this. What should I change in the photo to fix this problem?

Thanks!

File:Виктория_Булитко_БУЛИТКА.jpg

DescriptionYann/archives 14	Виктория Булитко
Date	01.05.2012
Source	Own work
Author	Akunopaka (Андрей Сокол)

Akunopaka (talk) 06:04, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

>> As this image has already been published elsewhere ( http://vk.com/bulitka ): I uploaded this photo to vk.com by myself.(I'm admin of this group); I don't see any possible of trouble here. Why are you put this situation in a this hard way? I have no more wish to upload any of pics to wiki. (: Thanks

Akunopaka (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am the owner of this photo. And I want to share this photo on wiki via Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 licence. Why I must vindicate my right to this photo like I'm stolen it?

So what is solution here?: * I must made another photo and upload to wiki at first before another sites?; * I can sent to you the source in high resolution of this photo and other from this photo-session (Photos that has never been uploaded to the internet). Maybe this will help you to approve this photo and restore.

Thx Akunopaka (talk) 12:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, I've uploaded this image with higher resolution. File:Виктория_Булитко_БУЛИТКА.jpg Regards 21:38, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Yann!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:US-Federal-Reserve-Note-Series-1934-1-B-Cleveland-Ohio.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:500-Million-Dollar-Series-1934-Federal-Reserve-System-Inventory-List-for-Bond-numbers-D-45183601-A.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:500-Million-Dollar-Series-1934-Federal-Reserve-Note-Cleveland-Ohio-Coupon-Bond-D-45183601-A-Obver.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:500-Million-Dollar-Series-1934-Federal-Reserve-System-Federal-Reserve-Certificate-for-Bond-numbers.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Bonjour,

Vous avez supprimé des photos que j'avais ajouté à l'article "Comédie de Reims". Je suis nouvelle sur wikipedia et je ne comprends pas forcement encore tout. Et je ne comprends pas pourquoi ces photos ont été supprimés. Ce sont des photos d'archives qui sont en la possession de l'établissement la Comédie de Reims.

Merci pour votre aide. MLeg13 (talk) 15:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pepita Sánchez

Hi,

it's Norgodian. I've seen you have delete some of the pics i've uploaded for an article I recently created for Pepita Sánchez, a former Spanish gymnast (well, actually she's my mother). Concerning the file "Pepita Sánchez.jpg, please, could you delete it too? By now I have not enough information on the copyright. I'll get in touch with the press agency to see how could I use the file in a proper way. The same thing for the rest of deleted pics.

It is my very firt article in wikipedia so I'm trying to learn as fast as I can but I have to confess that all these concepts and norms related to copyright and licenses are a mess for me (by now!). Thanks for your help and understanding. --Norgodian (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Yann. Sure, it is complicated. I guess I could get a permission from the Spanish News Agency EFE but I'll have to pay for using the pics. Well, I have to decide what to do. I'll let you know and maybe i'll ask you for some help with any doubt i may have. Thanks!!! --83.247.136.57 17:59, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Swami Vivekananda

Can you please check this page–

Is description box needed? I have not started working in descriptions, so most descriptions are either blank or very short!
How to show only English description at top of the page by default? --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 11:55, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Panoramio_Salé.png

Hi, Yann. Could you have a glance at this photo montage? I'm sure I recognize several pictures uploaded by the same user (to whom Herbythyme, currently on holiday, already gave a due warning) and already deleted (like File: Marina sale.jpg). Cordially. --Frenchinmorocco (talk) 15:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, je vois seulement en haut de cette page que j'aurais pu m'adresser à toi également en français.

--Frenchinmorocco (talk) 15:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Autre indication : en haut à droite de ce montage, se trouve cette photo : http://www.hansrossel.com/photos/morocco-pictures-images/photos/morocco-sale-medressa-4319.htm (tous droits réservés) ; téléchargée par le même utilisateur (averti ici et sur WP-fr) et déjà supprimée sur Commons avant le téléchargement du montage (a priori celle-ci). --Frenchinmorocco (talk) 06:07, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dans ce cas, tu peux simplement ajouter un avertissement "sans source" ou "violation de copyright", suivant la certitude du problème. Cet utilisateur pousse les bornes un peu trop loin, un petit blocage est nécessaire. Yann (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, merci. Je connaissais depuis peu {{Copyvio}} mais pas l'autre modèle. --Frenchinmorocco (talk) 11:09, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Victoria Polykova From Starcast of 'Yeh Khula Aasmaan' flew kites (9).jpg

Can you delete the earlier revision of the file? I had to crop it because the original had a photograph of a non-free poster which failed de minimis. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 09:57, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Independência ou Morte

Why were the other "Independência ou Morte" files kept if they have lower resolution and quality? They aren't being used at all. --Lecen (talk) 13:47, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because duplicate is not a reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 13:51, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Then does it means that we can have 100 different and worse versions of the same picture? --Lecen (talk) 14:28, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We delete files if they are exact or scale-down duplicate only. Yann (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry

Hi, Yann.

I'm sorry for nominating an image without reading the guidelines, I followed the spanish instructions and I didn't see the guidelines, but I'll read them. Can I remove the nomination without waiting 24 hours?

Thanks, UnRar (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Retrait du lien JB-2010-WIKI.jpg, supprimé sur Commons par Yann

Bonsoir Yann, Le 16 juillet à 18:45 vous avez supprimé une photo de Jocelyne Béroard que je venais de télécharger : "File:JB-2010-WIKI.jpg, supprimé sur Commons par Yann." Je voulais vous informer que cette photo est libre de droits, que c'est une photo prise par Jocelyne Béroard elle-même. Sur sa demande je modifie actuellement l'article qui lui est consacré sur Wiki et, en premier lieu, je change sa photo. Elle m'a demandé de mettre la photo que vous avez supprimée. Pouvez-vous le remettre ? Sincères remerciements. --Geehair (talk) 17:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion requests

Bonjour, Yann. Je profite que tu parles français et que je t'ai dentifié comme tel pour m'adresser à toi :D. Pourrais-tu, à l'occasion, jeter un coup d'oeil à mes commentaires sur cette page, concernant des fichiers pour lesquels une suppression a été envisagée le 2 mai dernier ? Cordialement. --Frenchinmorocco (talk) 15:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:National Front at London Gay Pride 2007 edit.jpg

File:National Front at London Gay Pride 2007 edit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Prof. Professorson (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thanks

Yann, thanks for the comment on my pic. Well, this is one situation where there is no correct way, the reasons for one to like an image may be the reason why someone else doesn´t. I often use shallow dof in order to make the eye, and the mind, travel on the picture and lead it to an area of critical focus, which is what the mind seeks. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn´t. Regards! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:August Landmesser with circle.jpg

File:August Landmesser with circle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 11:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:MGA73/Possibly unfree

Hi. You just deleted this "template". It was still in use so there was a lot of red links ;-) But never mind that because I simply replaced the usage with {{Disputed}}. --MGA73 (talk) 20:39, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Hello, Yann. You have new messages at Hedwig in Washington's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Commons:Deletion requests/File:TSN2 HD.png

I do not feel you have addressed the concerns I brought up at this deletion request; please do so, because as it stands I plan to appeal the request by reopening. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

There are 3 people against you who think that this logo can be kept. And please, do not reopen the DR unless you have a court case to back up your assertion. Bulwersator nominated for deletion dozen of logos without any legal information. That's not useful. And your dispute with Fry1989 does not help resolve the matter. Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Decisions should be based on policy and law, not head count. Anyway, I asked another few admins what to do to dispute your closure; they said to reopen it. Is there any way for someone to appeal an administrator action? I will reopen the decision to appeal it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:21, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is fine to reopen it if you bring substantive arguments. Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:28, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:46, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Durga Burdwan 03 10 2011.JPG

Thank you. Will it gain support to become FP? Regards. -- JDP90 (talk) 13:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

QI question

I noticed that you have alot of experience with quality images, so I hope you don't mind a quick question. I've uploaded hundreds of images like this: File:William Black 1.jpg from public domain pdfs at archive.org. Do you think images like this taken from pdfs could qualify to be quality images? INeverCry 19:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

No, they would not qualify, not only because of low quality, but because they are not works of Wikimedia contributors. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your help. That solves it all for me, as I haven't uploaded anything I created myself, apart from a few personal images. INeverCry 07:23, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Structure administrative de l'Inde.jpg

Bonjour,

Vous avez raison pour le tehsil, le schéma tel qu'il est n'est pas clair: le tehsil (d'ailleurs le nom ne convient pas ici, car il change d'un État à l'autre...) et plutôt un "sous-district". Je vais essayer de rendre le schéma plus clair.

En revanche, la Constitution indienne (plus exactement, son 73e amendement de 1993) prévoit trois types de structures différentes pour le niveau municipal, en fonction de la population: municipal council, municipality et municipal corporation. Il n'y a donc pas de redondance et "corporation municipale" est je crois la seule traduction qui permette de rendre ces différences juridiques.

Cordialement, --Superbenjamin (talk) 14:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Graphics lab

There is a question for you here--Vera (talk) 17:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion requests William Rothenstein images

British artist en:William Rothenstein died in 1945. Apparently images first published in the US before 1923 are in the public domain in the US. But, as far as I know, not in Great Britain and other countries. Why were these image then kept? Isn't there a rule in Commons that an image should at least be PD in the US and the country of origin? (see Commons:Public_domain#Interaction_of_United_States_copyright_law_and_non-US_copyright_law) Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These documents were published in USA and UK, AFAICT, so the USA are as much a country of origin as UK. Yann (talk) 10:32, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's weird. So, an English artist creates a piece of art in the UK, and they are published in the UK. Therefore they are not in the PD in the UK, am I right? Please explain. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:17, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, that's not weird. It is published both in UK and USA, and for our purpose, both USA and UK are countries of origin. It is the case for many English books, which are published in several countries in the same time. Yann (talk) 14:04, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I feel you avoid my question, I am not talking about the US: what is the copyright status in the UK? And if that would be PD, why is that? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, it might still be under a copyright in the UK, but the question is moot for Commons, i.e. it has no practical impact or relevance. Yann (talk) 07:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have asked the question to others over here, because I want to know what others think about this interpretation. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Annenhof palace in Moscow (map, 1739).png

Dear Yann, Why did you delete File:Annenhof palace in Moscow (map, 1739).png? There are two maps there, one is from 1739 (sic!), one is from Wikipmapia (which is CC-BY-SA). What was the problem? You marked it as a Google copy, which is obviously wrong to anyone who would bother to look at the piece of the Google map in question. Wikidim2 (talk) 16:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, that was an error. Sorry. Yann (talk) 07:47, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gandhi and Jinnah Bombay 1944.jpg

File:Gandhi and Jinnah Bombay 1944.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:27, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FOP, etc.

Bonjour, Yann. Quelques mots pour te remercier de tes interventions au sujet de mon fichier "Tourbières de Vendoire". Je suis bien d'accord avec toi et le doute ne m'avait même pas effleuré, alors que je garde sous le coude quelques fichiers interdits de Wikipédia. Toutefois, je ne suis pas très coutumier de ce genre d'incident, alors ce matin j'ai mis la main sur le nom de l'architecte (il habite à moins de 30 km de chez moi) et sur son adresse mail. Je lui ai donc adressé une demande préalable et, en cas de refus de sa part, je n'aurai qu'à m'incliner, ce qui n'est pas fondamental (!). À ce sujet, et puisque tu es plus ancien que moi sur Wikipédia, une question : le formulaire à remplir et à faire signer est bien celui de la page Commons:Messages type, cadre n° 2 (Déclaration de consentement) ? -- J'avoue que je suis un peu rebuté par ces à-côtés de la photo et que je me sens davantage enclin à renoncer qu'à persévérer dans ce domaine (c'est sans doute l'âge : bientôt 64 !). Peu importe : l'incident non-FOP m'aura permis d'entrer en contact avec toi, et c'est toujours agréable d'échanger deux mots avec des gens dont on voit les photos en ligne. Cela m'a en outre donné l'occasion de regarder d'un peu plus près ta page d'accueil et tes fichiers pour en prendre de la graine... -- Très cordialement. JLPC (talk) 12:39, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oui, c'est bien ce texte qui est à renvoyer pour une permission. Je pense que certains admins ont une vision beaucoup trop restrictive de ce qui peut être déposé ici ou pas, et cela m’agace pas mal. Bonne chance pour essayer d'obtenir une permission, mais c'est rarement possible, car il y a trop d’intérêt en jeu. Yann (talk) 12:55, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Crafts Museum, New Delhi

J'ai découvert ce projet en voyant des photos en QIC, félicitations c'est très interessant. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merci, ça fait plaisir. Yann (talk) 11:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

question

I understood that you live in India or at least you spend a lot of time there.. It is a pity that I didn't contact you last February because I was travelling to India for 5 weeks.. ;-)

My question is the following... may-be it is out of topic.. have you tried to travel from India -> Myammar -> Thailand?

One of my plans is to organize a trip.. flying to Delhi or Kathmandu (wherever I find the cheapest flight), then cross all India go and visit Myammar and then Thailand.. and fly back from Bangkok. Ggia (talk) 12:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, I have never made such a trip, but it would certainly be fascinating, and with the democratization of Myamar, it might now be possible. Tell me if you succeed doing that. Yann (talk) 12:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thanks! Ggia (talk) 13:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Durga Burdwan 03 10 2011.JPG

Hello, Yann. As you told me I have nominated this image for FP and it is featured now. Is it possible to make it picture of the day for 22nd October 2012? Because 22nd October is the main day of festival (Mahastami as said in bengali) for this year. Regards. -- JDP90 (talk) 08:00, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, sure. If the date is already taken, you may have to negociate to swap the other picture to another date. Yann (talk) 08:03, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Am I permitted to do this or only administrators can? --JDP90 (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can do it. As the page for the month of October does not exist yet, you have to create it. Yann (talk) 08:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. And page for the month of October exists. For 22nd October I have to negotiate with Jkadavoor as his picture is already taken for the date. -- JDP90 (talk) 08:16, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My bad. I should clean my eyes. ;o) I checked at October 2013. Yann (talk) 08:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not that bad. Small mistakes happens. :) -- JDP90 (talk) 08:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Changed the image. There was initial difficulty as I had not done this before but Jkadavoor helped me a lot. -- JDP90 (talk) 09:59, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escultura San Roque y el Bailador Calamocha.png

You closed this deletion request as delete, but forgot to delete the file. Could you please do it now? User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 12:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oops, done. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletions

I'm sure copyright infringement. Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 16:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Actors/Actresses from India

These are supposed to be a master categories, all the actors/actresses are meant to be categorized under the respective state and language categories which are listed under here. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It does not matter if the actor/actress is from UP or MH, they all work for Bollywood. If I look for an Indian actor/actress, I would have to search in all subcategories, which is completely unpractical and useless. Subcategories may have other uses, but in this case, it should not be substituted to the main category. A category may be heavy if it contain many images, but not if it contain many subcategories. Language is a more interesting criteria, but it is not replacement either: an actor/actress may shot movies in several languages. Yann (talk) 12:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, but this is absurd. ALL bollywood actors/actresses are classified under Hindi film actors and Hindi film actresses which is the correct category. India does NOT mean Bollywood and vice versa. What you are doing is a very unhelpful and impractical categorization that confuses the issue more than anything. —SpacemanSpiff 13:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MurukkuSg.JPG

Halo Yann,

May i know why the above mentioned picture is marked for deletion. That pic is taken from my iphone, what license need for that to upload ??????? Arulraja (talk) 14:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC)ArulrajaReply[reply]

File:Ayya1.jpg

Halo Yann,

Those pics uploaded from a website (That website is maintained by me) and provided the license accordingly. Why it become a problem and marked for deletion ? Arulraja (talk) 14:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC)ArulrajaReply[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for your help yesterday. JDP90 (talk) 15:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much. Yann (talk) 16:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Remerciements divers

Merci de ton commentaire et de ton offre concernant mon fichier "Angoulême Horloge marché 2012.jpg" : je viens d'uploader un nouveau fichier en tentant d'aller dans le sens que tu m'indiques et en tenant compte de la remarque de Jebulon. Si ce n'est pas suffisant, expédie ta retouche mais, au cas où elle serait QI, il faudra l'ajouter à ta liste de promotions, pas à la mienne ! -- Autres remerciements concernant le fichier "Vendoire 24 Maison tourbières 2011.jpg". Je n'étais pas intervenu car j'avais pris contact par mail avec l'architecte (un voisin : 25 km de chez moi !) et j'avais reçu son accord de principe. Je lui ai donc transmis le formulaire le 25 et il ne devrait donc pas tarder à répondre. D'ici peu, le fichier devrait, en principe, avoir deux raisons d'âtre maintenu. Quoi qu'il en soit, merci de ton attention : je ne rencontre que des gens sympathiques sur Commons-France. -- Très cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 22:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vu ton fichier et ton avis sur la pendule dont le blanc pose un problème similaire à celui des ombres dans un paysage de neige. J'ai trouvé ton amélioration de la pierre impeccable. En revanche, j'ai trouvé le reste un peu jaune, ce qui est logique, et, finalement, j'ai fait un mélange des deux fichiers que j'ai téléchargé en signalant ta collaboration. -- À suivre et merci encore. Très cordialement. JLPC (talk) 13:22, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images de valeur

Bonjour,

Je souhaite nominer plusieurs de vos images comme images de valeur. Pour cela, il faut qu'elles possèdent une localisation géographique, sauf si elles ont été prises en studio. Je l'ai fait pour File:Solange Fernex (de Turckheim) par Claude Truong-Ngoc 1977.jpg. Pourriez-vous m'aider pour File:Serge Gainsbourg par Claude Truong-Ngoc 1981.jpg ? A quel endroit cette photo a-t-elle été prise ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour,

Comme indiqué sur le diffférent de modif, celle de Solange Fernex, a été prise dans le bâtiment du Conseil de l’Europe à Strasbourg et non dans le nouveau bâtiment du Parlement européen qui n’existait pas. Celle de Serge Gainsbourg, dans son appartement, 5 bis, rue de Verneuil à Paris. Merci. Cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Guerre du Rif

Re- bonjour, Merci d’avoir enfin traité en conservation cette image. L’histoire du fake était un peu compliqué, un contributeur turc mal intentionné l’avait recadrée et légendée en surimpression prétendant qu’il s’agissait de français durant la guerre d’Algérie. Tout est bien qui finit bien. Bonne journée. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 05:22, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Conversion de format et licence

Bonjour Yann,

Une image convertie de format gif en format svg doit se mettre sous quelle licence ? J'ai mis DP en attendant mais suppose que cela ne doit pas convenir ? --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

La même licence. Ça me semble bon ici avec {{Cc-zero}} qui correspond. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 05:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion of my images

Hi, some of my recent uploads are marked for deletion and some are deleted already. The comments provided are "Probably not own work seing uploader history, no source, no permission" looks way too vague. I have close to 1000 contributions in commons - some of the images are of low quality due to conversion from old optical images and background masking done manually. If you are commenting on uploader history, check whole upload history and not superficially. I am removing tags on my work. Also two days is very less a time for delete before discussion. Some of my previous images were deleted as the mail template for permission was not wrong & i have requested the owner to upload himself. If you still feel discrepancies, please ping me back.Ssriram mt (talk) 21:59, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reopened DR

Hi Yann, probably best to notify you that I've reopened Commons:Deletion requests/File:Matti Rantonen Harvester Rockissa.jpg as the file is no longer in use. Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fine. It is already deleted, so I closed the DR. Yann (talk) 05:09, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images in Category:Phare de Berck

Hello Yann, I see that you have undeleted these images, which were deleted by User:Jameslwoodward following a deletion discussion, and which, following discussion at Village pump/Copyright and your undeletion request, User:Fastily found no consensus to restore. Has there been another discussion about these that I haven't seen? If your undeletion was not based on some discussion other than(and after) those I mentioned, I'll ask you to undo it. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 12:21, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, there was more discussion with Jim, and Jastrow, who is the most knowledgeable about French copyright here, agreed that this design is too simple to get a copyright. Yann (talk) 12:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, thanks. cmadler (talk) 13:15, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please restore my files you've deleted

Please help me restore these files from deletion.

The names of buildings. roads and places are sourced from there (where copyright can't be claimed; or do you mean you wish me to do Original Researches?), but the rest are all drawn by myself, so nothing is copyright violated.

Thanks. --Moonian (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok fine. I restored them and created deletion requests for community decisions. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Batch upload maps of India and Pakistan from the U.S. Army Map Service

Your requested batch upload maps of India and Pakistan from the U.S. Army Map Service is running now. (I prefer this little job) Please check, include check for dups too please. --Slick (talk) 17:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks a lot! Yann (talk) 05:45, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mario Bros with Cube - Graffiti.JPG

You closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mario Bros with Cube - Graffiti.JPG with the claim Graffiti is illegal, therefore no copyright. Not only is that unproven, but it's entirely irrelevant. The graffiti artist is not the holder of the copyright of Mario Bros, and the graffiti is therefore a copyright violation, and so is a photo of it. In this case, the problem can be effectively removed, so the file does not need deletion, but such a closure is very wrong, and I'd like you to reconsider it. Rd232 (talk) 23:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And it is also de minimis in this case. Please look for more useful battles. Yann (talk) 05:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not brush off serious questions - we cannot have Commons admins who do not understand the basics of copyright (or don't think they're important). Just now you've provided the same rationale Graffiti is illegal, therefore no copyright at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kefalonia Fae085.jpg, where it is an appropriate argument (though I'm not 100% it is correct, I'm willing to go along with it in the absence of more evidence). But it's absolutely not the case for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mario Bros with Cube - Graffiti.JPG, and nor is that case de minimis: the description and filename makes it crystal clear that the copyrighted element is central to the motivation for the taking of the photo; this is the opposite of de minimis. Your adding this example to COM:DM just proves you don't understand DM. Rd232 (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not try to teach me copyright law, nor previous Commons practice. It is certainly not allowed to tag this monument, therefore this graffiti is illegal. This file can be renamed if you think it is important. Yann (talk) 10:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

COM:AN

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#User:Yann. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Rd232 (talk) 10:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Did you see my suggestion about Commons:Contributor feedback? If you'd be willing to open a section there, that would be the beginning of the end of this mess (especially if you would concede your obvious error in forgetting about Nintendo's copyright in your closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mario Bros with Cube - Graffiti.JPG). Rd232 (talk) 14:39, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image du dromon à retirer

Salut!

Constantine (Konstantinos Plakidas) m'a expliqué que la loi grecque ne permet pas de photographier une maquette dans un musée pour créer une image à partir de cette photo (seulement pour usage perso) et qu'en plus la maquette en question est une mauvaise reconstitution (en fait il faudrait la retirer du musée). Et en plus, qu'il fait éviter les marquages dessus dans WK. Moralité, je suis tout à fait OK for the deletion.

Cordialement, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour,

Pourriez-vous préciser de quelle image vous parlez ? Yann (talk) 06:59, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Boulogne-Billancourt Place Le Corbusier.jpg

Bonjour, Pourrais-tu préciser si cette place et le bâtiment au fond ont été créés par Le Corbusier, ou si c'est seulement le nom de la place. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour, cette place comme les bâtiments qui l'entourent date de la fin des années 1990. TCY (talk) 22:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Autre chose: ou est cette place?? Le nom est vraiment "place le corbusier"? Rd232 (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

J'ai ajouté la localisation. D’après Google Maps, c'est "Grand-Place". Yann (talk) 06:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image guidelines

Hi. I saw your FPX here. According to Guidelines: Images should have at least 2 real megapixels of information.

If you think this image is too small but fit guidelines, shouldn't you simply oppose and not use FPX? Thanks. --M.casanova (talk) 07:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Adi_Bielski_068.jpg

Hi Yann,
You've deleted this picture only a day after I had uploaded it. Shouldn't it be 7 days given before deletion?
I have already sent the permission for Cc-by-sa-3.0 to OTRS and I didn't know I had to put "OTRS pending" template (or the license itself) in there.
Would it be possible to reconstruct the file until the permission is approved?
Thank you, Liadmalone (talk) 14:10, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, fine. There was no license, but I restored it. Thank you for your participation. Yann (talk) 14:17, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your co-operation. Liadmalone (talk) 14:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Urantia Book, 1st Edition.djvu

Yann, it was omitted from the request for deletion requests that these files are also duplicates of File:The Urantia Book, 1st Edition.djvu Apart from these being duplicates, though I will admit to a higher resolution, they are djvu which automatically means that they are not of quality to replicate, and that the work is in so many multiple components basically means nothing will happen with it once the other version has been reproduced at English Wikisource.

I believe that the discussion has been closed too quickly, that all the parts should be concatenated into the one discussion, and I do not see the need for a speedy close. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:51, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So do you mean that all content from Category:The Urantia Book are duplicate? Regards, Yann (talk) 14:09, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Taylor, Elizabeth posed.jpg

Uploader WikiWatcher1 is currently blocked for several or few more days. Honestly, you closed the debate as "kept", yet keep votes have been very faulty. If majority triumphs logic, then why am I having doubts? --George Ho (talk) 22:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DR opinions are not votes. Majority is no power. What is important is law. I followed the opinion of Carl Lindberg, who is the most knowlegeable expert on copyright law here. Yann (talk) 05:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lindberg is not officially a consultant of copyrights, is he? No matter what he says about this photo, prior publication has not yet proven. --George Ho (talk) 15:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

He is 10 times more competent than you, that's the point. Yann (talk) 15:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Back to this photo, I am trying to find original proprietor by searching it in Rex Features, but one photo is inaccessible. To access, I must work for a company. Moreover, side borders and back photo are omitted. Speaking of Lindberg, you seriously think that this photo was published in magazines and any other, do you? Copies of periodicals are hard to find, and microfiches are becoming obscure. We are still unsure if it is a British work or not. --George Ho (talk) 22:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why delete File:Biboy Rivera.jpg picture?

Dude,

I know the picture came from Facebook but I was given permission by the person to use his photo (he's given me a jpg file instead)and I've emailed permissions-commons@wikimedia.org regarding it since they've sent a warning regarding the photograph.

I hope you consider it now. What's your email address? I'll send you an email copy regarding his permission.

Don't be too deletion-hungry. What I'm trying to come up here is clean and not spammy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Autobahnned (talk • contribs)

You are not the photographer, so you need to send a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. See COM:OTRS for details. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I already sent an email to that specific email address. The guy who owned the photograph sent me a permission through his email. Now can i get the picture back up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Autobahnned (talk • contribs)

According to OTRS volunteer, a more detailed proof of consent is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bollywood/India etc

In response to your comments (I'm quite busy off-wiki now, so not active currently).

Reg Bollywood, Marathi/Gujarati films are not covered by the title, only Hindi (see en:Bollywood) although there sometimes is a misconception and there's incorrect classification.
Reg a wikiproject for India, I think that's a good idea as we have many users contributing to different language wikis and this will be a good spot to coordinate naming conventions as well as a lot of maintenance work on images. If you wish to start this, I can post a note on a couple of the wikis and there are others (Sreejithk2000, Animeshkulkarni, Jayantanath, MikeLynch, etc) who are active in other language wikis and can possibly help coordinate editors from there to participate here.
As far as Actors from state vs Actors from India, I don't have a particular preference on this; however, if we have state, I don't think we should be cluttering the country with it. I'm fine with establishing a convention of either one of them, but I don't want a mix of both. So far, at least as far as India is concerned (and I'm a recent participant to the categorization), I've seen the "from state" finding more favor.

cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 05:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, so here we go: Commons:WikiProject India. Yann (talk) 05:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I support the formation of new Project. That would also facilitate taking up other activities in a group. United we stand!
Should we apply at Commons:WikiProject Council? ||Dharmadhyaksha|| {T/C} 12:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ravel

Bonjour,
J'ai écrit un bref commentaire sur la page que tu m'as signalée au sujet des oeuvres de Ravel, mais je ne peux pas vraiment aider à répondre à cette question complexe que je ne connais pas bien. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image :gairola(caste).GIF

Dear Yann

I am surprised that an image loaded by me is removed by you without any specific reason.This image was an animation which was clicked by me and animated also by me. It really disheartens users when such steps are taken by your side. Please give a suitable reason and what does Out of scope means. Please when you are ignorant towards complexity of Indian Caste system then y do u take such steps with much information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aloak1 (talk • contribs)

Please read COM:SCOPE. Everything is explained there. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:04, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI, I didn't delete any file you uploaded with Aloak1. Two files were deleted by INeverCry because they are copyright violations. Please read COM:L. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Batch uploading/Works of Maurice Ravel

Salut Yann, je vais potasser mes bouquins, mais je préviens que je n'y connais rien en prorogations de guerre. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, merci. Ça sera toujours mieux que l'opinion d'amateurs nageant dans l'imbroglio des droits d'auteur. Yann (talk) 10:46, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quick question

Hi Yann. I've been asked to restore File:Albert Anton von Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt.jpg and another like it. Aside from the copyvio issue for which this was deleted, I wonder about restoring such tiny thumbs of paintings? Both of these files are 2 or 3kb. Are they even in scope? Thanks for your time. INeverCry 15:28, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Such tiny images are useless for us. Yann (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I figured as much. Thanks for the quick response. INeverCry 15:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The same user uploaded a few more of these thumbs earlier. I've done a mass DR for them: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by David Eisen. INeverCry 16:01, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

arab gas

Regarding your un-deletion of File:05 04 21 Gas the Arabs.jpg: two important points were overlooked in the closer's summary statement, and don't appear to have been considered by you in undeleting the file. Specifically:

Documented consent for the photo's subject (which is required in Israel) isn't on file, and
The image is out of scope, as it cannot be used in a remotely objective/npov fashion.

I'm asking you to self-revert and re-delete. Failing that, I'm asking you to explain your suggestion that the DR be re-opened, as the nomination page now reads "This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive." 24.177.121.137 17:40, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, This is the wrong place for your request. As I said, if you have further issues, reopen the DR. The DR was closed for the wrong reason. Then as someone requested undeletion, it seems quite justified to undelete the picture. I have no problem to be deleted again with a proper rationale. Yann (talk) 05:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affiche rouge.jpg

Salut Yann. Just wanted to let you know that I have now moved the slightly different version of this image that had been sitting at en.wiki under fair use to Commons. Please see File:Affiche rouge 182x152.jpg. De728631 (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Elding 2.jpg

Hi, you recently deleted this image. I'm just wondering if that was correct, considering the relevant deletion request is still ongoing? Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 14:50, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't mean to be a nuisance but a reply would be appreciated. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 15:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is certainly a copyright violation. The uploader has to prove that it isn't. Please discuss the matter in the DR, not here. Yann (talk) 05:03, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But isn't it right that image(s) are only deleted once the DR has concluded? At WP I've never seen articles, categories etc. deleted before discussions are closed, so why does it happen here? I know this isn't the DR, but it's a query over the possibly premature deletion of images, so I thought it best to drop you a message. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:21, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In case of copyright violation, there is no delay. Images can be deleted any time. Yann (talk) 17:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sources

Turelio said I could ask you about a sources issue. I am interested in uploading some French archival pix for an article on a French subject going back to the 1920s-30s. The source would read like this: L'Affaire Papin, Editions Cenomane, Le Mans 1988. Would this be accepted as a source? I don't want to waste my time doing the uploads if the source won't be accepted.

Sardaka (talk) 08:28, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, that would be OK as a source. Be sure that the document is in the public domain, or to have a permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:32, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Restore message @Fastily

I noticed you left a message for Fastily about restoring files. Fastily is no longer an admin. INeverCry 19:03, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jimi Blue Ochsenknecht 02 Oktoberfest 2012 mit Freundin.JPG

You have deleted my file on the basis of it being a copyright violation. I would like to know the reason and evidence to support your claim. Also I would also request you to next time atleast inform the uploader before deleting his/her file. Boseritwik (talk) July 16, 2012 18:19 (UTC)

Was the link being wrong the reason given? Boseritwik (talk) July 16, 2012 18:34 (UTC)

Erledigt --Usien Max (talk) 17:49, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done I wished the autopatrolled user tag came with a bit of faith Boseritwik (talk) July 16, 2012 18:40 (UTC)

Sources again

Thanks for the quick answer. Does PD mean the author has to have been dead for over 70 years? Is there any way that material can be PD if the author has not been dead for 70 years, e.g. if the author is unknown? Sardaka (talk) 07:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In most cases, yes. If the picture was published without any attribution, it can be said to be anonymous, then it is in the public domain 70 years after the publication, therefore a date of publication is necessary. Yann (talk) 09:46, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Undelete File:Възел на Маринкова.png?

Could you review if we can restore File:Възел на Маринкова.png as a PD material? You deleted it as "Insufficient information. Needs a permission", but I found that this is in public domain, from a work of Henry Gray (1827-1861), Anatomy of the Human Body, 1918. The illustrator is Henry Vandyke Carter (1831-1897) per w:en:Gray's Anatomy. See also [5]. --whym (talk) 23:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, done. Yann (talk) 03:51, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for this, and completing the description :) --whym (talk) 12:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

COM:AN

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#Deprecating widely used templates. You created this problem by unilaterally closing the DRs; so you may as well help solve it..

Rd232 (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Indian copyright

All Indian anonymous images are in the public domain 60 years after creation. But if there is no proof of creation, then assuming PD-India is violation of Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. [6] Ravi Varma Press shut in 1980. What is the proof that the image was published pre-1952. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Yann. I've responded about this on my talk: User talk:INeverCry#Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanuman showing Rama in His heart.jpg. INeverCry 18:38, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Raison de suppression ?

Bonjour Yann,
Je vois, sur la page Help desk, qu'un utilisateur demandait conseil au sujet du bandeau de licence à utiliser pour le fichier File:Geograph-2623148-by-John-Salmon.jpg qu'il venait de téléverser quelques minutes auparavant. Or quelques heures plus tard tu as supprimé sans délai le fichier en question pour cause de copyvio, mais sans explication plus précise. Je ne peux pas voir le fichier supprimé mais, considérant le titre du fichier, s'agissait-il de cette photo de ce photographe ? Si oui, et si le seul souci était que le bandeau de licence n'était pas encore apposé, n'est-il pas possible dans ce cas cas d'utiliser l'avertissement "No license since" plutôt qu'une suppression sans délai ? Dans le cas où il s'agirait de cette photo, le fichier peut-il être restauré ? Par ailleurs, dans le cas où il y aurait un problème de copyvio différent, pourrais-tu préciser sa nature pour l'information du téléverseur ? Merci d'avance de ton aide. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, restaurée. Je n'avais pas vu le message sur le help desk. La source n’était pas mentionnée, et le lien vers l'auteur non plus. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 02:56, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]