User talk:Yann/archives 44

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)

Hi all, following up on last month's announcement...

Multilingual file captions will be released this week, on either Wednesday, 9 November or Thursday, 10 November 2019. Captions are a feature to add short, translatable descriptions to files. Here's some links you might want to look follow before the release, if you haven't already:

Read over the help page for using captions - I wrote the page on mediawiki.org because captions are available for any MediaWiki user, feel free to host/modify a copy of the page here on Commons.
Test out using captions on Beta Commons.
Leave feedback about the test on the captions test talk page, if you have anything you'd like to say prior to release.

Additionally, there will be an IRC office hour on Thursday, 10 January with the Structured Data team to talk about file captions, as well as anything else the community may be interested in. Date/time conversion, as well as a link to join, are on Meta.

Thanks for your time, I look forward to seeing those who can make it to the IRC office hour on Thursday. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Captions in January

The previous message from today says captions will be released in November in the text. January is the correct month. My apologies for the potential confusion. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)

My apologies if this is a duplicate message for you, it is being sent to multiple lists which you may be signed up for.

Hi all, following up on last month's announcement...

Multilingual file captions will be released this week, on either Wednesday, 9 January or Thursday, 10 January 2019. Captions are a feature to add short, translatable descriptions to files. Here's some links you might want to look follow before the release, if you haven't already:

Read over the help page for using captions - I wrote the page on mediawiki.org because captions are available for any MediaWiki user, feel free to host/modify a copy of the page here on Commons.
Test out using captions on Beta Commons.
Leave feedback about the test on the captions test talk page, if you have anything you'd like to say prior to release.

Additionally, there will be an IRC office hour on Thursday, 10 January with the Structured Data team to talk about file captions, as well as anything else the community may be interested in. Date/time conversion, as well as a link to join, are on Meta.

Thanks for your time, I look forward to seeing those who can make it to the IRC office hour on Thursday. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translation notification: Commons:Moving files to Commons

Hello Yann,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to French on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Moving files to Commons is available for translation. You can translate it here:

translate to French

The priority of this page is low.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 09:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Denis Poniž.jpg

Please consider File talk:Denis Poniž.jpg. You should have waited for my explanation. --Hladnikm (talk) 17:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, created a DR instead. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Paintings_in_The_J._Paul_Getty_Museum

Paintings in The J. Paul Getty Museum has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Multichill (talk) 22:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:In Bed With...Sonia Ben Ammar - LOVE.webm

File:In Bed With...Sonia Ben Ammar - LOVE.webm How is this a copyright violation? Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. It was posted by LOVE. https://web.archive.org/web/20171216174758/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R50bCSSsxdQ --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, restored, and regular DR created instead. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:22, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion discussions and copyvio speedy deletion

I saw that you started deletion discussions for two images I had tagged as copyright violations, only to immediately close them and delete the images. I assume the point was to add Category:Undelete in 2025 so we can get the images back once they're out of copyright. Can you maybe take a look at my deleted contributions? I think I tagged more than two as copyvio (plus a bunch of deletion discussions for less clear-cut cases), and if there's another or two, getting them undeleted in 2025 might also be useful. Another question: Is there any rule on when this "nominate and categorize" approach is preferred to "speedy delete"? Thanks, Huon (talk) 01:05, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Huon,

Yes, it is recommended to list the files for undeletion if we know a fixed date. The other solution is to manually add the file name in the category, but creating a DR is faster. ;oP I deleted the files you nominated. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:51, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Benz-Patent-Motorwagen Replica Mannheim rem 2.jpg

File:Benz-Patent-Motorwagen Replica Mannheim rem 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Goesseln (talk) 12:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sissinghurst Castle 10.JPG

Hello Yann - a while back you were able to help me with a misnamed image of St Donat's Castle when it was TFA. I'm now back with the begging bowl re. the above. We are wanting to use it in a planned FAC for Sissinghurst Castle Garden. However, there are concerns that it's not appropriately tagged. You can find the discussion on Wiki at Talk:Sissinghurst Castle Garden#Image of Sir Richard's house, [1]. I'd be very grateful if you could have a look and, should you agree with the suggesting tagging - a licence for the photograph itself, and then a UK-Right of Panorama tag - make the necessary changes or advise me as to how I could do it myself. Thanks very much in advance. KJP1 (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@KJP1: Hi,

I added {{FoP-UK}}, so it should be OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're a star. Thanks very much indeed. KJP1 (talk) 17:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hà Quỳnh Như.jpg

Hello Yann, I am Hiệu from Vietnamese.I took this screenshot in a youtube video online. I'm new to Wikipedia so I don't know how to upload a photo without violating a problem. Please, can you give me a guide? thank you very much. Hope you help and withdraw your Deletion requests? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjeuruht179 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Hjeuruht179: Hi,

As mentioned in the deletion request, these are screenshots from Vietnamese TV shows and are copyrighted. Almost every picture is under a copyright. You are not allowed to upload them here without a permission from the copyright holder. Only pictures you take with your own camera are allowed. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yann:

Thank you for your help and sharing. We can upload photos and have sources, authors ... obviously can we? I saw many images on the network that could be uploaded. I have not understood these regulations
Hjeuruht179 (talk)

Files considered for deletion (own works)

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I am very cognizant of copyrights and infringements, and I intent to abide by Wikipedia policies. The below files are all my own works if you consider I cropped and edited the photos. Some of them are completely my own works. Is there a way to reflect where the original photos came from? Also, is there a way to remove from consideration the photos which I took, or photoshopped?

File:Bodybuilder Karla Nelson.png
File:Vladimir Petrov (wrestler).png
File:John Birrenbach (politician).png
File:Pine County Sheriff's Dept. Vehicle.png
File:Hunter Warner.png
File:Pine City High.png
File:Otto Kuss.jpg
File:NathanJohnson and Goldy.jpg
File:Pine County Fair.jpg
File:Pine City Pride Flier.png
File:Askov Finlayson North Hats.png
File:GC Outdoor.jpg
File:GC Mille Lacs.jpg
File:Grand Casino Mille Lacs * Hinckley Logo.jpg
File:NB pop. sign.jpg
File:PICKM Map.jpg
File:Tommy Ryman Head.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by John2690-john2690 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@John2690-john2690: Hi,

These are small files without EXIF data, and in PNG format, which suggests that they were copied from the Internet.

But cropping and editing a picture doesn't make it your own. It is still the work of another person.

For your own pictures, it would be better to upload the original images with full EXIF data. They also would be more useful for Wikipedia. And you need to send a permission for the logo. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:13, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the information. Still learning. Based on what you're saying, feel free to remove all but these files: NathanJohnson and Goldy, Pine County Fair, Pine City Pride Flier, PICKM Map and Tommy Ryman Head.--John2690-john2690 (talk) 14:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Money of Poland

Question Would the first year or the last year mentioned in files like File:500zl r (1948-1950).jpg be the more important year as far as restoring it? Abzeronow (talk) 17:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow: If 1948 is the year of publication, then it is in the public domain now. Checking a currency catalog might be useful. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can't see the image but if it matches this http://banknotypolskie.pl/banknoty/395/500zl/ it looks like 1948 would be the publication date. Abzeronow (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not the same, this is this one. Yann (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Matches File:500 zł 1947.jpg. Abzeronow (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, do these of these match up?

File:20zl r (1948-1950).jpg http://banknotypolskie.pl/banknoty/392/20zl/
File:100zl r (1948-1950).jpg http://banknotypolskie.pl/banknoty/394/100zl/ Abzeronow (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Billy tears small.jpg

File:Billy tears small.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

~ R.T.G 21:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Undelete

Hi Yann can you undelete File:ETN 50 g plastic explosive effect in steel.png? If you look at the other users uploads, it seems likely that YouTube channel belongs to them, so they are the copyright holder.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BevinKacon: Hi,

Then it would be very easy to change the license on YouTube, isn't? Regards, Yann (talk) 07:01, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requesting a block on a user

Hi Yann, I was wondering how I go about requesting a block for a user who repeatedly uploads copyrighted images, claiming their CC 4.0? User:Amishai GG has continuously uploaded images of new governors and/or state elected officials, despite warnings. Their talk page is a good example of all their uploads that have been deleted. They continue (w/latest upload on 17 January) and aren’t likely to stop. Thanks, Corky 06:23, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Corkythehornetfan: Please see COM:AN/U. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! Corky 12:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Brymo

Hi Yann, I recently uploaded four images of Brymo. The images can be found at Category:Brymo. All of the images are from a single YouTube video that has been licensed under a creative commons license. Can you please review these images and confirm them. Thanks in advance. Versace1608 (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open street maps prepared by community

Hi Yann, I am working with tribal communities to build knowledge on forest resources. One of the task is to map the community resource boundaries of the villages. We are using smartphones & Open street map data to prepare these maps. I kindly request you to guide on the licenses and templates to be used for such maps while uploading on Commons.
--Subodh (CIS-A2K) (talk) 06:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Subodh (CIS-A2K): Hi,

OpenStreetMap content should use {{OpenStreetMap}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gabrielle Ristori

Bonjour Pour info, J'ai téléchargé l'image Gabrielle Ristori.jpg, à partir de Gallica et j'ai vu qu'il y a un débat sur la convention BnF-ADM-2012-046109-01. Je suis perdu, merci de corriger si besoin. Merci. Cordialement--Thcollet (talk) 06:50, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour,

Ah oui. Ces images avaient une mention "domaine public" qui a été remplacée par cette convention, dont le texte n'est apparemment pas disponible publiquement. Que faire ? Je ne suis pas sûr. Demandez sur le Bistro... Par ailleurs, il y a une version en haute résolution ici. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 07:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bon anniversaire !

Bon anniversaire Yann !
Pour l'avoir vu sur le bistro ce matin Je me permet, avec beaucoup de plaisir, de venir te souhaiter un excellent anniversaire.
C'est vrai quoi... 19 ans, 29 heures et 75 secondes... ça se fête ! Alors comme ça, le mois de janvier, c'est ta fête... c'est excellent !
A l'avenir, j'aurai une petite pensée pour toi à chaque mois de janvier. Très sincère bon anniversaire Yann, que nous ayons le plaisir et le bonheur de t'avoir pas loin de nous dans nos heures innombrables de contributions. Très cordialement, —— DePlusJean (talk) 10:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:DRbox2

Hi. Re this edit, what is wrong with {{DRbox2}}? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 18:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I always remove them. What is this useful for anyway? Regards, Yann (talk) 18:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chrome Wikipedija XP.JPG

Why did you remove my tagging of this file without any explanation? If you read the linked terms of service you will see that Google Chrome is proprietary software and therefore screenshots of it cannot be released under random free licences. Copyright violations are normally taken seriously on Commons. The issue needs to be addressed and not just reverted without comment. - Ahunt (talk) 19:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Chrome interface is de minimis here. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, thanks for your explanation on that. Perhaps in future you could add an explanation of the reason for your revert in your edit summary. - Ahunt (talk) 14:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One more question: The file is under a BSD licence which from the evidence is clearly incorrect. How to we fix the licensing? - Ahunt (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah right, I removed this one. Thanks for caring. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I think we are all trying to keep all the licensing here accurate. - Ahunt (talk) 21:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, but...

...I have requested ogg file extension, not oga. All pronunciation files are supposed to be in form of <langcode>-<word>.ogg (modulo exceptions). Please move them to the name with requested proper extension, thank you.

— Danny B. 16:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Danny B.: Hi,

This is automatic. All sound files are renamed to .oga, when the name is changed. I tried, but I can't change it back to .ogg. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for info. Got any idea where this was discussed or at least announced (assuming the announcement would link to the discussion or at least rationale behind)? Thank you.
— Danny B. 16:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, but this is not new. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The picture of Badai is not copied from Facebook

It is my own work. I am the copyright owner. Please do not remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by C.J. Anderson-Wu (talk • contribs) 01:02, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@C.J. Anderson-Wu: Hi,

Well, it is copied from Facebook. If it is your picture, please upload the original image with full EXIF data. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:17, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Faure - Encyclopédie anarchiste, tome 4.djvu

File:Faure - Encyclopédie anarchiste, tome 4.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 07:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ogg to oga

Hello from Category:Greek pronunciation. During renaming of an xxxx.ogg file (e.g. File:Ell-Hlios.ogg to File:El-ήλιος.ogg requested here) I see that it changes extension (here). It also happened with File:Ell-nychta.ogg to File:El-νύχτα.oga. Is this normal? I do not see any 'oga' files in the Category. (Sorry for being ignorant). Sarri.greek (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, I have just read the section 'Thanks, but' (above). No need to reply.
This means, that no renaming can be done for ogg files: A new COPY must be done. (reuploading with new name). I guess. Sarri.greek (talk) 19:25, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Catégorisation des cartes d'État-major

Bonjour Yann

J'ai hésité hier à ajouter des catégories relatives aux départements ("old map of..." and "Topographic maps of...") car je me disais :

d'une part, outre le département du nom de la feuille (qui n'est pas toujours une préfecture à ce que j'ai vu), fallait-il ajouter les autres départements que la carte montrait ?
et, d'autre part, fallait-il mettre les noms des départements actuels ou les noms de l'époque pour les départements disparus comme la Seine-et-Oise ou qui n'existaient pas comme le Territoire-de-Belfort ou de la Meurthe ? Par exemple, les feuilles de Melun, montrent toutes des parties de l'ex Seine-et-Oise (notamment les feuilles SO et NO), idem pour les feuilles de Paris qui montrent des parties de l'ex département de Seine. Les deux départements de Seine et de Seine-et-Oise ayant été découpés en nouveaux départements : Paris, Val-de-Marne, Seine-Saint-Denis, Hauts-de-Seine, Essonne, Yvelines et Val-d'Oise".

A la suite de tes ajouts dans une des feuilles de Melun, j'ai fait des ajouts ce matin pour mettre aussi les catégories relatives à la Seine-et-Oise. Mais je ne suis pas convaincu moi-même.

Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 13:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Poudou99: Bonjour,

L'objectif des catégories est de retrouver les fichiers, donc j'utilise les noms actuels, et j'ajoute le département même si une petite partie est dans la carte. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, je vais garder ta cohérence, c'est à dire mentionner les noms des départements actuels issus des redécoupages des ex departements de Seine et de Seine-et-Oise. Merci, --Poudou99 (talk) 13:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour Yann.

Je ne sais pas si c'est une bonne idée (ou si j'ai mal fait), mais j'ai catégorisé la page : Commons:Carte d'État-major dans Category:État-Major map, 1866, complete sheets in HR, ceci afin de retrouver facilement cette page et permettre sa mise à jour (la mention de l'existence de cette page n'étant faite que dans le bistro et, à terme, la discussion sera archivée).

Après avoir ajouté des feuilles au tableau, je retourne maintenant à mes téléchargements/versements de feuilles. Puis, utérieurement, je ferais des extractions de certaines feuilles pour illustrer la section "histoire" des articles de communes françaises WP-fr auxquels j'ai contribué. Je pense aussi faire une annonce dans la page de discussion du projet "Communes françaises" pour intéresser les contributeurs de ce projet. --Poudou99 (talk) 18:34, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Poudou99: Oui, très bien. Excellent travail pour le tableau. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 06:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:VDA T316, Generaloberst Guderian.JPG

Last one in the Undelete in 2019 category. "considering artwork (see also byline "Original von Wolf Wilrich") most likely by German artist and writer de:Wolfgang Willrich (1897—1948), copyrighted till the end of 2018" Abzeronow (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tali undeletion

Hi. You helped me with this. However, the file with permission it's the older one. Apparently the other has a different CR holder. Is it possible to restore the previous file? --Ganímedes (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ganímedes: Hi,

I undeleted all versions. So please revert to the older one. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I tried, but I couldn't. Thanks. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ganímedes: OK now? Yann (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes!!!! Thanks a lot. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Venezuela president recognition map 2019.svg

Hello. I am the creator of "File:Venezuela president recognition map 2019.svg" and was hoping to make an update. I know that there has been some edit warring, but it is important that this map is up to date because it is being utilized throughout Wikipedia. I understand the edit warring, but it should be dealt with on an individual level and not blocking the whole file. If there is a policy of single reverts or something similar that can be used on Commons, I think that is more suitable. --ZiaLater (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ZiaLater: OK, I changed the protection. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Still says that the file is reupload protected only for administrators. Is there a way to only have this for autoconfirmed users as well? Mainly the necessary changes required involve Romania and Uruguay. The status of Crimea needs to be determined upon in the talk page since it is a recurrent problem.--ZiaLater (talk) 05:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ZiaLater: OK for me. Please clear your cache. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Undelete

Hi Yann, please don't forget to also restore the files deleted between 21:36, 3 July 2018 - 20:22, 3 July 2018. Thanks.--BevinKacon (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BevinKacon: I thought they were in the undeletion request? Regards, Yann (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, these are the ones mistakenly deleted because of our ignorance :-).--BevinKacon (talk) 13:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:My Family from 1914 (8494194275).jpg & File:The New Canon 5DsR (16405599685).jpg had their own dedicated DRs, so can safely be deleted under G4 criteria.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The first one is {{PD-UK-unknown}} and {{PD-US-expired}}. I deleted the second one. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All

Done. Yann (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! In the 1914 DR I had overlooked the uniform, so that DR can be considered withdrawn anyway. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reg. File:एक रहस्यमय प्राचीन इतिहास टीला में खोया.pdf

Regarding your comments in COM:UD#File:एक रहस्यमय प्राचीन इतिहास टीला में खोया.pdf that author's name is not shown on the scan. The name is present in the first line of the article (second and third words). Regards. Hrishikes (talk) 16:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah right. I was looking for a signature at the end, and the ticket number is ticket:2018082910001861. Fixed. Thanks for looking. @Ganímedes: FYI. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Picture on Satyagraha

Hello Yann!

Some time ago I asked a question on a picture about Satyagraha here on Wikipedia Commons. I suggested at that time, that I would draw an own picture on Satyagraha because then there are no copyright or other problems. This happened.

And I think that you could help me here! :-) I have translated the picture from German to English here.

Would you like to check, if my translation is correct? And do you think that the picture is understandable?

Thank you, Yann!

Friendly greetings from Bavaria/Germany, Stefan Quark48 (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Quark48: Hi,

Quite beautiful, but what is the objective? I don't think this could be used in Wikipedia, so ? Regards, Yann (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your answer! Well, the German version of this picture is already being used in the article de:Satyagraha for illustration purposes. It has also the notice in its caption, that it is an graphical interpretation. :-)

My hope is that maybe a graphical interpretation like this can be very useful instead of possibly copyright-problematic official material. For example: File:Mg-satyagraha.jpg. I hope you can remember my attempts to get a better version of this picture. If I understood it right, there are problems with freedom of panorama and other copyright restrictions in many countries. And spreading good things (and I hope you agree with me that Satyagraha is such a good thing) with graphical interpretations is an alternative to this. I hope you understand my standpoint. :-) Greetings, Quark48 (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Quark48: Yes, my concern is about "Own interpretation". This should be avoided in such cases. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Smoking machine image

At 19:50, 23 January 2019‎, QuackGuru requested a rename of File:Electrically-heated smoking devices being smoked by a testing machine.jpg to File:Heat-not-burn tobacco products being aerosolized by a testing machine.jpg under Criterion 4. There are some parallel name change request to other images. I am unaware of an image set that these changes harmonize; QG, could you please clarify? The claim that these products are "heat-not-burn", do not emit smoke, are not cigarettes, and should certainly not be taxed or regulated as cigarettes is heavily used in messaging by Phillip Morris, which sells them, but is disputed in reliable sources. en:IQOS and the associated talk page, where there has been a consensus for "smoke", will give the history of this disagreement. I was the original uploader, and I think that the original titles are more accurate. I'm not really sure what I should do about this, as I've not had files I uploaded renamed before, as best I recall. HLHJ (talk) 03:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You recently stated "Agreed that the title is poor, but "heated tobacco" is worse."[2] The article was moved to Electric smoking system without obtaining a clear consensus. The current title is original research and POV. Electrically-heated smoking devices is not a common name. An entire section contain mostly MEDRS violations and failed verification content. Those are not reliable sources. The word smoke was previously removed from the body of the article. I am not the only one who disagreed with the file names. QuackGuru (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Let us not conduct the article discussion here. HLHJ (talk) 01:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) It is appalling that Yann processed the request originating from the same user who recently had a reject on the same file by 1989. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you stalking me? You are stretching your luck quite a bit... Yann (talk) 09:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yann, please, desist from threats against me. I mean only things discernible as threats by an experienced Wikimedian, not merely criticism of my actions or low estimates for my competence, which may result from predictable reciprocation. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mine d'argent d'Ikuno 1.jpg and File:Mine d'argent d'Ikuno 2.jpg

Any hints why? And where a random user should look for information which undeletion procedure was applied here? Is the DR still pending? Also, the license template seems to be invalid as 2013 > 1957. Ankry (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I am working on it. These are obviously old images, so 2013 is not the correct date. But as I don't read Japanese, some help may be needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I undeleted more from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gregory 14. Most of these files are OK. I would appreciate if someone helps. In some cases, best would be to undelete and start a new DR, as it is quite difficult to find the information with the file deleted. @Abzeronow: Would you like to have a look please? Yann (talk) 16:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Before 1945 seems reasonable for those two photographs. I can't seem to go to the webpage in the source so I can't run it through Google translate. Abzeronow (talk) 16:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominated File:Christian Bansa.jpg for deletion. Would need more info on that photograph to keep imho. Most of the those files seem OK though. Abzeronow (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, thanks. Yann (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All

Done. Yann (talk) 09:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PD-old-100-expired

Hi Yann, Can you explain to me when we are supposed to use this template? (I mean the "expired" part.) I've been looking for an explanation, but so far have not figured it out. Best, --Robert.Allen (talk) 10:30, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Robert.Allen: This is for the copyright in USA. You can compare {{PD-old-100}} and {{PD-old-100-expired}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you know when one should use -expired rather than -1923? The result looks identical to me. --Robert.Allen (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Robert.Allen: Now you should use {{PD-old-100-expired}}. PD-old-100-1923 is a redirection. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Sorry, I did not notice that! Dummy, me! Best, --Robert.Allen (talk) 10:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Robert.Allen: PD-1923 was right for many years but finally became obsolete this year as works first published in 1923 in the US entered the public domain. Instead of renaming to PD-1924 (which would mean renaming every year), after some discussion we settled on "expired". - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My 4 illegal uploads

Hello Yann,

firstly, I would like to notice that I did NOT upload further material after your warning. I had uploaded all four files at once and after that no more.

Sorry for my late response, because I was on vacation this week. I had consulted the upload of the files with YjM who had edited the Wiki page "Transnacionální radikální strana" but he also could not help me in this matter.

The four files I had uploaded are scans from one flyer of a political party which appeared during the enthousiastic times after 1989 revolution. I found the flyer in my personal archive, and I found it important to point to one of the members from that time, Jaromír Soukup, who now is owner of the important media complex Empresa media, TV owner, moderator, and announced candidate for next president elections in the Czech republic. The flyer is an undoubted document, so I wanted to make it disposable to the Czech public as part of articles about Mr. Soukup, and about the party, the Transnacionální radikální strana.

Therefore, I uploaded the four parts of the flyer. After a while, I received warnings from a bot to provide copyright information but neither me nor YjM were capable to do so (especially on a mobile phone screen). Therefore, I decided to regret to this documentation and to have it automatically removed after 7 days, but I was sorry to actively remove it from the site. I understand that there are copyrights supposedly attached to the party. But it has been resolved almost 30 years ago, and according to my understanding, it is in every party's interest to be public on the most open level, this is the very sense of a flyer.

So what is your opinion in this case: Is it an illegal upload or is there a version of copyright that tolerates this?

Thanks a lot for your advice, Peter Wagner — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterOWagner (talk • contribs) 10:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@PeterOWagner: Hi,

On Commons, we only accept works with a free license, or in the public domain. Therefore, you are not allowed to upload any document not created by you without either a permission, or an evidence of a free license or public domain. Your files show neither. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for listening to the community! - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And as for Jcb's insults towards you, I think that was nothing personal. Jcb has lately been picking fights with.. hmm, almost everyone I guess? Jdforrester, Magog, Guanaco, you, and I'm probably forgetting some. So I can't imagine that was personal. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I only saw his comment now. I still didn't finish to clean the mess he created, so I am a bit fed up by his play-all-alone game. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:29, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

TechCrunch

Hi. I uploaded this image from TechCrunch, but User:FlickreviewR 2 still recognizes TechCrunch as a bad author. Hanooz 08:35, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

52522100@N07 needs to be removed from User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors. These lists need to be synchronized but that'll take time. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 09:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, done. But <censured> about the mis-synchronisation of these lists. :( Yann (talk) 09:55, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Hanooz 12:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Alexis Jazz/Flickr blacklist synchronize, so now we know who messed up what. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:17, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

URAA question

Since URAA tends to make me rather angry when I think about it, just want to check on something: 1924 painting from a French artist who died in 1937. Copyright restored by URAA or not? (would any WWI extensions come into play there?) Abzeronow (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow: Yes, I feel the same. 1937 is on the border line. Probably URAA, but who knows?

BTW, I noticed that you edited Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Paintings by Theo van Doesburg (which is in my watchlist). We should be able to undelete at least the first 2 files, isn't? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I was going to request undeletion for that "circa 1922" one. So I think that's cleared the URAA by now. Abzeronow (talk) 16:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	. Emallove (talk) 17:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Peter Schlemihl's Miraculous Story.jpg

I hope now it's ok, thanks--ΑΝώΔυΝος (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ΑΝώΔυΝος: Yes, it looks better. Is the author mentioned a person or a company? That might change the copyright status in the USA. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's a Company (Publishing House) name, not existing any more. All the best, --ΑΝώΔυΝος (talk) 04:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

permissions notifications

Hi Yann, I will have all the appropriate parties send in permissions emails for the images I uploaded. Two or three will be from me because I am the author. I will have the photographer himself send in permission and the designer of the logos send in permission. Thank you for letting me know and the emails will be sent soon. 'chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leighcn (talk • contribs) 02:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Leighcn: Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About my edit on the admin noticeboard.

Hi there, and apologises for me posting that on the wrong place. I am wondering where do I post it instead? I cannot post it on English Wikipedia, as I am still blocked. Do you any suggestions. Thank you very much. The Duke of Nonsense (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@The Duke of Nonsense: Please see here: en:Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Sockpuppetry blocks. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, but that's not what I meant. I meant what should I do here, and at other wikis to boost my chance of the admins ruling in my favour. I didn't mean how to appeal, but what I can do to make my appeal better. Thanks for the quick responses! The Duke of Nonsense (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@The Duke of Nonsense: As I said, the projects are independent. Regular editing here won't have much influence on the English Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, thanks anyway. Please don't think I thank you sarcastically , I mean to thank you. I'll try somewhere else. Thank you (again). The Duke of Nonsense (talk) 17:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please assist me

I tried to upload the image of Andrew Kim from the commons, but I stuck with the error message below. "You do not have the permission to review images, this edit was therefore disabled." Please help me to upload the image. From the File:Secretary Pompeo Toasts DPRK Vice-Chairman Kim (42414828242).jpg --> I cropped the image of Andrew Kim. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 09:13, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Goodtiming8871: I am not sure I understand the issue. Do you mean File:Andrew Kim (42414828242).jpg? Regards, Yann (talk) 13:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yep, Thank you for your kind response. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 03:47, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gabibbo

Sorry. Where can I find a photo with the right license? In Italy the Gabibbo is a famous tv mascotte since 1990. It is not possible that there is not a photo on Wikipedia... those that are there are not of the original puppet.

Thanks --Binbingiu (talk) 13:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Binbingiu: Most probably, you can't. The mascot itself is copyrighted, so any picture would be a derivative work. The English Wikipedia may accept a fair use copy. Please see en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:49, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Permission for image File:Dharitri-Terangpi.jpg

Hi, kindly check the email for OTRS Permission for image File:Dharitri-Terangpi.jpg. --Vrisle (talk) 19:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done Could you please add categories. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Y.haruo (talk) 06:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Y.haruo: Good catch, but I don't know why you posted here. When these will be in the public domain in Japan? Regards, Yann (talk) 07:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Although referring to the comment of the files, please forgive me if it was wrong.

A new copyright law came into effect at the end of last year, and the term of protection of Japan was extended to 70 years after author's death. Therefore, the copyright of these works expires January 1, 2043.

But, it does not apply to copyrighted work that became the public domain before the amendment of the law. The protection term of the works which the authors died before 1968 is 50 years.--Y.haruo (talk) 07:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Abdul Ghafar Khan, Nehru, and Sardar Patel 1946.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 17:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Piet Mondrian-View from the Dunes

OK, is File:Mondrian_-_View_from_the_Dunes.jpg the same as File:Piet Mondrian, 1909, View from the Dunes with Beach and Piers, Domburg, MoMA.jpg? Just wondering if it's worth requesting undeletion of the first file. Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow: Yes, it is the same painting, but the picture is smaller and not better. Not needed IMO. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:14, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, wanted to make sure. Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OTRS ticket

Please restore File:Berlin_United_e._V.png that you deleted as we now have an OTRS permission for it. Please ping me when it's restored. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ww2censor:

Done Yann (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Gandhi and Kasturba 1942.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 10:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wyatt-earp-1923-lg.jpg

Deletion Request for this file didn't name the photographer(only mentioned death date of 1958). Can you check to see who the photographer was? (trying to determine if done by an American photographer or an European one) Abzeronow (talk) 16:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nevermind, I found out on my own after some very frustrating web searching. John H. Flood. Probably was unpublished so I'll put Undelete in 2029 on the DR. Abzeronow (talk) 15:29, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

URAA images restored today

Yann, I don't like the URAA any more than you do, but at the moment it is the law in the United States and our clear policy is that images must be free of copyright in the source country and in the United States. Our policy as set forth at Commons:URAA-restored copyrights is clear -- if the URAA applies to an image, we must delete it.

"If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle."

Unless and until we change either the law or our policy, it seems to me that as our most senior Admin you have a duty to follow policy and not restore images that are clearly under copyright in the USA.

I have no desire to start battling with you, but if you don't change your ways on this, I will have no choice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

Well, nothing is really clear about URAA. No one can really be sure that a file is still under copyright because of URAA: there are various probabilities depending on each case. We have been undeleting or keeping these files for the last 5 years, and although there is no consensus, I think there is a majority of people for keeping them. And AFAICT, the majority is growing. You were not active for some time, so you need to get informed the current situation.

We already have exceptions for various cases (PD-Art, FoP, etc.), so having an exception for URAA wouldn't be so new. Basically, we should keep files which are in the public domain world wide, except USA (and Mexico). Regards, Yann (talk) 23:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First, I don't see how you can say that nothing is really clear about URAA -- the law is clear that in almost all cases if a work was under copyright in its source country on the URAA date, then it will be under copyright in the USA as if it had been under copyright here from its creation. The USA has a long copyright, but so does Mexico and other countries.

Second, fine, I don't object to our changing Commons policy. If there is a majority that believes we should ignore URAA, then we should change policy (this assumes that WMF legal will agree that we can igore USA law). However, I do object to some of our members, including you, ignoring policy and doing what they think is best. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 08:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The issue is that we often do not know when the copyright expired, so we can't be sure if URAA applies or not. Then the image may have been published in USA at the time. Typical cases are pictures of Gandhi from the 1930s: we don't know when they were first published, and we don't know either if they were published in USA or not, but Gandhi was already a world famous personality, so it is quite probable. That's why I advocate an exception.

WMF Legal opinion on the matter is that the community should decide. IMO this is similar than pictures of recent sculptures and works of art allowed because of FoP. If we would apply the law strictly, we could not have these on Commons, as FoP in USA doesn't allow them. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright

Block me, then! The files I uploaded were from Instagram, how do you suppose I put a link on for that? Forgive me if I just want an (ex) actor's page to have his bloody photo. StrangestWitch (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@StrangestWitch: You are not allowed to copy images from external sources without the formal written permission of the copyright holder. You will be blocked if you do it again. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:42, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It was a damn screenshot! I took it from a wallpaper story highlights, made for OTHERS and I said that it wasn't my own creation. This site is all so terribly high handed, no one cares if you have the same photo as them. There are thousands of the same photo circulating on different sites, how am I supposed to know where it's from originally! StrangestWitch (talk) 16:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@StrangestWitch: Other websites may not care about copyright, but we do. Usually these could be acceptable elsewhere under a fair use rationale, but fair use is not accepted on Commons. Please read en:fair use and COM:DW. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Horger Antal-1.jpg

Hi! Please send a warning to user:Tambo. He is always changing for a worse version this file. Thank you. --Regasterios (talk) 20:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DR

Hi Yann, The consensus over at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sexy librarian look (15022862928).jpg was to keep the image, If you object to the keeping of this image then you should re-dr the image,
The OP's rationale was refuted by 3-4 editors so as such this should not have been deleted,
Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The scope is a debatable issue, but this image used with this title is a privacy violation at least. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't care, The consensus at those DRs was to keep so again please restore all of the images you have deleted (IE File:Chad would make a great sexy librarian.jpg, File:Sexy librarian look (15022862928).jpg, File:The Sexy Librarian Look (3902980364).jpg and File:Sexy librarian (481593155).jpg), If you don't I'll take this matter to AN/U,

Like I said you're more than welcome to re-dr the file but at present you have abused your admin tools by deleting files that had consensus for keeping,

It's no different to File:London Eye - 01.jpg being sent to DR > Admin deletes even tho everyone said keep - You just wouldnt delete it would you ?.... same applies here,

Again you can either restore the files and send them back to DR or I can take you to AN/U and we can discuss it there, Your choice. –Davey2010^Talk 15:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just closed pending DRs, and there is no consensus to keep any of them. You are welcome to ask for undeletion. And do not make threats. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes you did however you need to weigh the consensus too which you clearly haven't done - You've simply took a distaste to them and deleted them,

this DR had overwhelming consensus to keep whereas the other 3 had one Keep - You as a DR closer should have relisted the other 3 (and then closed this one as Keep),

If you genuinely believe these are deletable then restore the files and resend them back to DR - I'm sorry but there absolutely no consensus to delete these files so again kindly undelete them and send them back to DR - The images have now got attention at the CFD so as such more people can weigh in and if they're deleted again the fine I will be happy with that but at present you have deleted 4 images ignoring everyones comments at those DRS and I firmly believe these was no consensus to delete those 4 images,

If you genuinely believe your actions are correct then as I say undelete them and send them back to DR and everyone can have their say,

Thanks, Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 17:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I count 3 for keeping, and 2 (including mine) for deleting. I don't see any consensus. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm talking about the DRs not the CFD ?, The DR listed above had 2 !keeps and 1 !delete (nominator) .... Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright violation dispute.

You have deleted a file and sent a delete request to another that I've uploaded under the ruling of copyright. However, I believe the request and the deletion were made in error as neither violated any copyright nor needs any fair use protections.

For the 7 Grand Dad image, the screenshot in question is from a game with no copyright to begin with and is thus a free screenshot. 7 GRAND DAD is a pirate game so it would be illegal to copyright it and the J.Y. Company no longer exists technically making the game vaporware.

As for the Animation Magic logo, it is simply a colored font and does not meet the threshold of originality, hence the PD-textlogo tag I used. Also, your nomination reasoning is just the tag with a question mark. That is inadequate reasoning for why something should be deleted. If you do not know the reasoning for the tag, just ask. User talk pages are available for a reason.

I look forward to your response and hope we can come to a settlement soon and without any bad faith.

Thank you for your time. AwesumIndustrys (talk) 02:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@AwesumIndustrys: Hi,

Yes, I am not sure about the Magic logo, that's why I didn't delete it right away. You can add your comment in the deletion request.

For the 7 Grand Dad image, I am afraid, it doesn't work that way. There is probably still a copyright because it is a recent creation, and it is probably a derivative work of the Mario character. You can still ask more opinions on COM:VPC, and ask for undeletion on COM:UDR. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you help with something real quick?

Hi again. I'm coaching a new editor, User:Devlet Geray, and we are trying to remove a photo mistakenly believed to be acceptable for commons (it wasn't). He overwrote the file with a completely different photo that is acceptable on Commons because he wanted to make sure the copyrighted image didn't get used anywhere else...but he didn't know about the issues with overwriting files. I've already explained all the issues with overwriting files with him on VK, and I hope you are forgiving and lenient since there was no bad faith and he tried to fix it when it happened. Can you just delete the old version of File:2019 March in Moscow about internet.jpg (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/0/0d/20190311225900%211029_March_in_Moscow_about_internet.jpg) and the redirect (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:%D0%90%D0%B9%D1%88%D0%B5_%D0%A1%D0%B5%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0.jpg&redirect=no)? I told him to just put a speedy delete tag on the page, but that was before he told me he overwrote it, and we only want the first photo to be deleted. Thank you for taking care of this, --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@PlanespotterA320:

Done Yann (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you!--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aide bis

Coucou, alors voici la petite image ici :http://fdtcompany.freeservers.com/photos/JHFitch.jpg qui date d'environ 1900. J'aimerais l'insérer si possible, dans un article sur wikipédia. merci. Datsofelija (talk) 19:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)datsofelijaReply[reply]

@Datsofelija: J'ai restauré l'image, comme je l'ai dit sur votre page de discussion : File:John H. Fitch.jpg. J'ai aussi trouvé une autre version de meilleure qualité. ;o) Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merci beaucoup ! ah oui ? Je peux l'ajouter ? ou il faut attendre que je sois débloquée ? Merci !! Datsofelija (talk) 07:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)datsofelijaReply[reply]

Deletion requests

Hi there. Regarding this; before I uploaded any images, I was advised to look through the licensing for various video game logos, which I did, seeing that by far the most common tag was PD-text. So I uploaded the files with this tag. Now, if that's incorrect, so be it, but I'm a little confused how The Settlers Online logo, for example, meets the threshold of originality, but images like this, this, this, and this do not. Thanks. Bertaut (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bertaut: I am not certain, but I think these logos are too complex, and therefore have a copyright. You can add your comment(s) in the deletion request. Then another admin will decide. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, will do. Cheers. Bertaut (talk) 01:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - development update, March 2019

This text is also posted on the Structured Data hub talk page. You can reply there with questions, comments, or concerns.

A development update for the current work by the Structured Data on Commons team:

After the release of multilingual file captions, work began on getting depicts and other statements ready for release. These were originally scheduled for release in February and into March, however there are currently two major blockers to finishing this work (T215642, T217157). We will know more next week about when depicts and statements can likely be ready for testing and then release; until then I've tentatively updated the release schedule.

Once the depicts feature is ready for testing, it will take place in two stages on TestCommons. The first is checking the very basics; is the design comfortable, how does the simple workflow of adding/editing/removing statements work, and building up help and process pages from there. The second part is a more detailed test of depicts and other statements, checking the edge-case examples of using the features, bugs that did not come up during simple testing, etc. Additionally we'll be looking with the community for bugs in interaction with bots, gadgets, and other scripts once the features are live on Commons. Please let me know if you're interesting in helping test and fix these bugs if they show up upon release, it is really hard to find them in a test environment or, in some cases, bugs won't show up in a testing environment at all.

One new thing is definitely coming within the next few weeks, pending testing: the ability to search for captions. This is done using the inlabel keyword in search strings, and will be the first step in helping users find content that is specifically structured data. I'll post a notice when that feature is live and ready for use.

Thanks, let me know if you have questions about these plans. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About "Camino Caicumeo.png" and "Camino Real (Chile).png"

Hi Yann, I received your messages about problems with my pictures "Camino Caicumeo.png" and "Camino Real (Chile).png", but I didn't get a clear idea about the problem with these images. You commented both files as "derivative works" because I stated in the description that the drawings are based in old maps from articles and books, and that I should include copyright information about those original sources. On the contrary, I said that those maps are "own work", because both maps were manually drawed (maybe with imperfections) in Maphub (a CC map design platform), with no parts of the original maps in them. Should I include copyright information from original sources even in these cases? Both are maps from XVIII century anyway...--Ppn87 (talk) 12:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ppn87: Hi,

Your maps are derivative works, so yes, you need to provide the source(s) of your map, and ensure that they are under a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

undelete my picture

i upload a book cover page picture. please help me to validate it, File:جلد کتاب «مقدمه‌ای بر بررسی کتاب دده‌قورقود» نوشته میر علی سید سلامت – شابک 9-19-5964-964.jpg. rtirenji (talk) 15:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rtirenji: Hi,

You need to provide more information (date, author, place of publication, etc.), and probably a permission from the designer and/or the publisher. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lansdowne Herakles Getty Museum (retouched) 2.jpg

Just to show it, in case you like it. It a little bit less shiny :)--Pierpao.lo (listening) 08:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Prokofjev

File:Прокофьев Николай Дмитриевич.jpg This is a good file! See: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Прокофьев,_Николай_Дмитриевич The same file, just lower quality. Prokojiev died in 1913, no copyrights for his portrait. I was intended to change it afterwards. Valamo.ru is my own site.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alatena (talk • contribs) 12:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Alatena: Hi,

You didn't provide a license. I corrected it for you. And please fix the categories. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yann: Thank you so much!

help

Hi Yann I need to know what image format to put on Wikimedia Commons.

Whetdie (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Whetdie: Photos should be in JPEG format, logos preferably in SVG, or PNG. Can you be more specific? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hey, about 7 GRAND DAD title screen.gif

I know, i didn't create it, but, please can you restore File:7 GRAND DAD title screen.gif? The creator of the pirate (J.Y. Company) has been defunct since 2006, so i don't think there's anyway WC would be sued by this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Everyonegoes2018 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Everyonegoes2018: that may be true, but under Commons policy it’s not a valid argument for keeping copyrighted work. For one thing, we are concerned about ‘legal exposure’ not only on our own behalf (or the WMF’s), but also that of any & all reusers of the content here. For another, it is not unusual for a bankrupt company’s assets, including its intellectual properties, to be sold by the receivers or whoever, sometimes years after the fact. And the rights might still belong to an artist or agency if the company used the work only under licence.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:44, 16 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source

Hi. I reverted your edit [3]. The source of the file is clearly stated as "Source: Own work". Dont know what more information I can give. Hope thats ok. Regards. AlphaZeta (talk) 21:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, fine. Yann (talk) 23:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

uploading a photo from instagram

the photo that I uploaded is from instagram and I got the author's approval to use the photo on wikipedia in comments. Is this enough or do I have to do more? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmsjournalist2019 (talk • contribs) 08:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Zmsjournalist2019: Hi,

Please ask the copyright holder to send the permission for a free license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Please see COM:OTRS for the detailed instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is stated that the permission has to be sent from an email address associated with the website or listed on the contact page of the website. The author is an ordinary photographer with a personal email address! what can be done about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmsjournalist2019 (talk • contribs) 11:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Zmsjournalist2019: Do you have the ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes. it's Ticket:2019031810002012. Zmsjournalist2019 (talk) 07:21, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Zmsjournalist2019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmsjournalist2019 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Zmsjournalist2019: The client claims to be an appointed representative of the copyright holder, but it comes from a Gmail address. I think more proof is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

en:File:Cavalleria Rusticana - Santuzza and Turiddu outside the church.jpg, en:File:Cavalleria Rusticana - Santuzza and Turiddu outside the church.png and en:File:Cavalleria Rusticana - Santuzza and Turiddu outside the church - Original.jpg

I have to admit I don't know a lot about bringing over files. I usually just put them on Commons, and if I do put them on en-wiki, it's for a reason that will remain true for some time. Since I kind of want to maintain the rather large upload histories, could you possibly help me to bring them over? They should have the licensing information from File:Cavalleria Rusticana - Alfio and Turiddu embrace.jpg, but the templates for that don't even exist on en-wiki. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: Did you try the tool "FileExporter"? It is a beta feature, see in your preferences. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It said it was too big of a file size with all the alts. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WTF?!? What a crappy tool! Yann (talk) 13:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aye... Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: On the French Wikisource, I have the "importer" right. May be this could be used from the English Wikipedia to Commons? I don't even know who can give this right here (but not admins, so either bureaucrats or developers). Regards, Yann (talk) 21:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source

You, rather impolitely, gave me some warnings about two images that are mine and you erased. I uploaded them with a Creatives Commons licence. I would like to restore the picture of New Zealand's Prime Minister first since I, no longer, have access to the other one. How can I do this? Thank you. --Chlorineer (talk) 22:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Now, why are you reverting my edits just for the sake of them? https://www.csupomona.edu is not even a valid URL any longer! How can you be an Administrator if you make reactionary reverts when it does not suit you and when you are clearly wrong? Shame on you. --Chlorineer (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Chlorineer: First calm down. Your URL is not valid either, so I don't see the point. It seems you have an agenda, and this is not accepted. And finally, nobody believes that you are the photographer of these images. Yann (talk) 23:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yann: First, lay off the condescending tone. I don't make reactionary edits. Second, https://www.cpp.edu is a valid URL. Third, you claim I have an agenda without proof. Fourth, where is this survey you conducted where you found that "nobody believes that you are the photographer of [this image]?" It's my work. I took the picture. I think it is of interest, significant and of encyclopedic value. --Chlorineer (talk) 23:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Chlorineer: The link you added is dead. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spring is coming

	Happy Nowruz!
	Happy Nowruz! I wish you a good new year! 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright violations

As for pictures like my high school logo picture - as far as I know it has not been legally copyrighted by anyone, which means that everyone has rights to it, isn’t that right?

If that’s so, how do I make this clear and publish it without backlash? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordParsifal (talk • contribs)

@LordParsifal: Hi,

Every photo and logo has a copyright by default, so you are not allowed to upload them here without the formal written permission of the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright violations - Bertil hammarkrans

Hey!

Thanks for your mail. I apologize if I have made any mistake. I am therefore very grateful for getting help so that this will be correct.

I have uploaded two pictures on Wikipedia: “Christallen.jpg” and “Christallen records.jpg”. Unfortunately, the photographer has died a few years ago but was a close friend of ours. We have permission to use these pictures.

On March 12, I emailed copyright information to permissions-sv@wikimedia.org.

The following 5 images are not current and can be removed:

What should I do so you can restore this? Thank you for your help.

Sincerely Bertil H — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bertil hammarkrans (talk • contribs) 11:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC) (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bertil hammarkrans: Hi,

Please sign your posts. Do you have the ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, have I missed something? I make a new attempt. Is it correct now?

Sincerely Bertil H --Bertil hammarkrans (talk) 13:09, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bertil hammarkrans: I have asked if you have the ticket number. You don't need to repost the same message 3 times. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, but I don't know what ticket number means. Thank you for your help. Regards Bertil H --Bertil hammarkrans (talk) 07:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bertil hammarkrans: Hi,

There are 2 tickets related to this: ticket:2019031210006547 and ticket:2019031210006556. But I don't speak Swedish, so you will have to wait for a Swedish OTRS agent to take care of them. Please note that the permission should come from the copyright holder, not from you. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bust of Fermín Salvochea.

Buenos días Yann: gracias por tus consejos. Efectivamente, la foto es mía. He buscado en el busto la firma del escultor, pero sin éxito - no he querido pisar los jatdines donde se encuentra. Intentaré subir la versión cmpleta con los metadatos de la foto a lo largo de esta semana. Saludos cordiales, Percy Moo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Percy Moo (talk • contribs) 11:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC) (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Percy Moo: Please give your opinion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bust of Salvochea in the Loreto neighbourhood, Cádiz, unveiled March 23rd 1985 and paid for by popular subscription.jpg. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright violations - Bertil hammarkrans

Thanks for your reply. How do I get in touch with the Swedish OTRS agent? Who will restore the images to Wikipedia? Regards Bertil H

--Bertil hammarkrans (talk) 13:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bertil hammarkrans: See Commons:OTRS/List of members by language. The file will be restored if and when the permission is validated, but it should come from the copyright holder, not from you. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - early depicts testing

The Structured Data on Commons development team has the very basic version of depicts statements available for early testing on Test-Commons. You can add very basic depicts statements to the file page by going into the new “Structured Data” tab located below the "Open in Media Viewer button." You can use the Latest Files link in the left side nav bar to select existing images, or use the UploadWizard to upload new ones to test with (although those images won’t actually show up on the site). The test site is not a fully functional replica of Commons, so there may be some overall problems in using the site, but you should be able to get a general idea of what using the feature is like.

Early next week I will call for broad, community-wide testing of the feature similar to what we did for Captions, with instructions for testing, known bugs, and a dedicated space to discuss the feature as well as a simple help page for using statements. Until then, you're welcome to post on the SDC talk page with what you might find while testing depicts.

Thanks in advance for trying it out, you'll be hearing more from me next week. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Imagenes

Hola, buenas tardes.

Las imagenes que has eliminado son de la empresa donde trabajo.

¿Como puedo demostrar que tengo algún permiso para utilizar las imagenes de la empresa? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryan.nabuurs (talk • contribs) 13:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bryan.nabuurs: Hi,

For all documents and logos previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS/es (in Spanish) for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have a copyright of my photo

You deleted my photo, but this photo is my personal photo, you sent me a link on Google that points to this image on the website (researchgate.net) these pages are me, this is my account page. You can check my page here: (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tamer_Elgebali) — Preceding unsigned comment added by تامر الجبالي (talk • contribs) 00:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@تامر الجبالي: Hi,

Who is the photographer? Regards, Yann (talk) 00:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Chlorineer

This user is uploading copyvio images again: File:Jacinda_Ardern_wearing_a_Mohammedan_or_Moslem_head_rag.png. // sikander { talk } 15:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done Blocked. File deleted. Yann (talk) 16:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Antóninho Baptista Alves 2018-11-20.jpg

Thank you for undeleting the file. But what o you meaning, completing author and source? Both is mention and the source is even linked. Greetings, --JPF (talk) 07:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I think this was done by Abzeronow. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:19, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I corrected the page so that source and author are shown. Abzeronow (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Undeletion of File:Zombie Boy (By Colin Singer).jpg

Hi Yann. I saw you wrote that the permission sent to OTRS is invalid for some reason. As this was sent and signed by the original photographer Colin Singer, I don't know why it's invalid? Please clarify. Thanks! ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zom.b.fan (talk • contribs) 10:57, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, ticket:2019021110007041 covers this. I answered the ticket. Yann (talk) 11:17, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sockpuppet

This guy is the newest sockpuppet of this user which both of them belong to a LTA case and sockmaster on En WP. He uploaded disruptive version of a file [4] which is identical to previous blocked sockpuppet's attempts.[5][6] I'm not familiar with WC. Where can I report such activities? Since his activity has been exposed on En WP, now he targets WC images for promoting his agenda. --Wario-Man (talk) 05:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done You can ask for a check user. Yann (talk) 09:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! --Wario-Man (talk) 06:43, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fritz Stuckenberg

I'd like to check if File:060815Stuckenberg01.jpg is the same or similar to File:Fritz Stuckenberg Selbstbildnis 1915.jpg. Fritz Stuckenberg died in 1944 so his work would be public domain in Germany. If the first file is different or larger/better than the second, I'd like to request undeletion Abzeronow (talk) 14:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, that's the same. I restored it. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Petite aide..

Coucou, Je viens t'embêter pour une image (ou plusieurs d'ailleurs). Voilà, je participe au wikiconcours et j'aimerais publier une photo de Joan sims celle-ci ou celle-la. Ou alors, si possible : celle ici Ensuite, une autre photo pour le film Carry On : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Carry_On_logo_illustration.jpg Je peux les importer ces photos ? M'autorise-tu à les publier ? Quelle licence utiliser ? Merci ! Datsofelija (talk) 22:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)datsofelijaReply[reply]

@Datsofelija: Le logo ne peut pas être importé sur Commons sans autorisation. Vous pouvez l'importer sur le Wikipédia en français avec fr:Wikipédia:Exceptions au droit d'auteur.

Les deux premières images sont sous une licence libre, mais je me demande si cette licence est valable. Je vais chercher.

Et la photo ne peut pas être importée ni sur Commons, ni sur le Wikipédia en français. Cela ne va pas être facile de trouver une image libre pour cette actrice anglaise. Vous pourriez demander sur la Bistro. Quelqu'un aurait peut-être une idée... Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:26, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pardon de la réponse si tardive ! Je te remercie ! J'ai questionné le bistro aussi

Datsofelija (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)datsofelijaReply[reply]

User talk:Yann/archives 44

Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)

Captions in January

Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)

Translation notification: Commons:Moving files to Commons

Denis Poniž.jpg

Deletion discussions and copyvio speedy deletion

Files considered for deletion (own works)

Undelete

Requesting a block on a user

Brymo

Open street maps prepared by community

Gabrielle Ristori

Bon anniversaire !

Thanks, but...

The picture of Badai is not copied from Facebook

ogg to oga

Catégorisation des cartes d'État-major

Tali undeletion

Undelete

Reg. File:एक रहस्यमय प्राचीन इतिहास टीला में खोया.pdf

Picture on Satyagraha

Smoking machine image

File:Mine d'argent d'Ikuno 1.jpg and File:Mine d'argent d'Ikuno 2.jpg

PD-old-100-expired

My 4 illegal uploads

A barnstar for you!

TechCrunch

URAA question

A barnstar for you!

permissions notifications

About my edit on the admin noticeboard.

Please assist me

Gabibbo

Permission for image File:Dharitri-Terangpi.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Piet Mondrian-View from the Dunes

OTRS ticket

Notification about possible deletion

URAA images restored today

Copyright

DR

Copyright violation dispute.

Can you help with something real quick?

Aide bis

Deletion requests

Structured Data - development update, March 2019

About "Camino Caicumeo.png" and "Camino Real (Chile).png"

undelete my picture

Prokofjev

help

hey, about 7 GRAND DAD title screen.gif

Source

uploading a photo from instagram

en:File:Cavalleria Rusticana - Santuzza and Turiddu outside the church.jpg, en:File:Cavalleria Rusticana - Santuzza and Turiddu outside the church.png and en:File:Cavalleria Rusticana - Santuzza and Turiddu outside the church - Original.jpg

Source

Spring is coming

Copyright violations

Copyright violations - Bertil hammarkrans

Bust of Fermín Salvochea.

Copyright violations - Bertil hammarkrans

Structured Data - early depicts testing

Imagenes

I have a copyright of my photo

User:Chlorineer

Undeletion of File:Zombie Boy (By Colin Singer).jpg

Sockpuppet

Fritz Stuckenberg

Petite aide..

Navigation menu

Search