User talk:Materialscientist

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Watermarks (again)[edit]

Dear Materialscientist, thanks for helping me out the last time removing the watermarks. Now I found a huge stack of watermarked files (over 700) which made me wondering on how to proceed and read the Watermarks policy. There it says that according to the WMF legal staff, removing watermarks might put the remover at legal risk as it is prohibited by some US and German law. A German court even ruled against removing watermarks. I do not want you to get into trouble for some nonsense as what you do is in good faith and of the files you removed the watermarks often exist better versions without the watermarks already on commons. The stack I found is here (over 700 files). I don't know what to do with it, in my opinion we could keep the files to provide the world with the knowledge that such paintings were painted. But I'd prefer you stop removing watermarks.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ахмет Байтұрсынов.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.123.231.16 07:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mike Lane 1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.9.152.52 23:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Humphrey Bogart and Mike Lane 1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.9.152.52 23:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mike Lane and Angela Stevens 1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.9.152.52 23:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Molotov with wife and Budyonny in 1966.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wrong license, no proof that it was published in the United States without a copyright notice
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : FlorianH76.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Почтовые марки Узбекистана[edit]

Добрый вечер! У меня к Вам просьба помочь с полной заливкой узбекских почтовых марок на Викисклад (их около 1,6 тысячи штук) - многие из них есть в высоком качестве на официальном сайте почты Узбекистана, где приведён их полный перечень с 1992 года. Также ещё нужна работа над категоризацией файлов, их распределению по годам по образцу с российскими почтовыми марками, а также переделать шаблон {{Stamps of Uzbekistan by year}} под {{Stamps of Russia by year}}. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Я регулярно заливаю марки всех стран на викислад, но только те которые реально использовать в статьях. Я знаю про uz.post и не вижу большого смысла в архировке их сайта на викисладе - разрешение там не всегда высокое, и единственная польза в заливке - улучшенный поиск и категоризация. Materialscientist (talk) 21:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Между тем, я залил все марки за 2000 год в высоком разрешении, а также за 2020 год. В целом же проблема касается марок многих постсоветских государств - по Таджикистану необходимо активно работать, учитывая то, что здесь многие марки в крайне низком качестве, но это уже несколько другая история. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On the use of fraudulent references[edit]

There are two fraudulent references in use in the Japanese Language section of Hiragana and Katakana. They are associated with the textbook YOOKOSO! page 13 and page 24.@Materialscientist 174.214.17.6 08:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:David Douglas Cunningham.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roryharrow (talk) 21:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]