User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi, you removed this file and Commons:Delinker removed the references to it. I guess it was a bit too speedy because CommonsDelinker hadn't processed the file move yet. Could you undo it? bdijkstra (overleg) 13:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It seems Commons:Delinker processed the file. It can take some time, but it will do the job once it is scheduled. Yann (talk) 14:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The problem is that CommonsDelinker processed the removal before it could process the move. bdijkstra (overleg) 10:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please Yann, can you undo the move or not? And if not, any advice? bdijkstra (overleg) 16:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Bdijkstra: Commons:Delinker did work, see File:Brednäbbad simsnäppa - Red phalarope - (Phalaropus fulicarius) - Ystad-2009.ogv. Yann (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes on some wikis it worked, but at least on nlwiki and svwiki the removal of the redirect got processed before the move, see here, here and here. bdijkstra (overleg) 16:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Yann - please see where the original discussion challenging the id of one of my images was taking place (see my last edit on that page). I shot the image during a trip to Alaska to visit friends who live there, and they told me it was Castner Glacier. While still the challenge is still in discussion, a retired Commons editor came in and made a rename move from File:Castner Glacier.jpg to File:Gulkana_Glacier.jpg before I was able to gather verifiable information confirming the glacier's identification. My image was used here, and in a few articles. The editor challenging the identification provided links to photographs by various photogs, one of which the photog themselves stated they were not sure their image was of Gulkana. "I could be mistaken, this could be Canwell Glacier, also in this general area." In summary, none of what the challenger provided is conclusive evidence as to the ID of the glacier. This image has a lake in front of it, and I never saw that lake during my visit. Can you please look into this? If it turns out that I was misinformed by my Alaskan friends who were kind enough to take us on a guided tour to that location during our travel to Valdez to go fishing, I will take the proper steps to correct the error. I just do not think it's right for it to be moved before I have had an opportunity to confirm and provide verifiable information (there are no GPS coordinates in any of the challenger's evidence). Thx in advance! Atsme Talk 📧 20:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Atsme: Hi,
I am sorry, but I am of little help here. I don't know that place, and I have never been to Alaska, so I can't who is right, or who isn't. There may be people on Commons who know that place. Please ask on COM:VP. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It doesn't matter if you know it, Yann. What matters is that someone moved the file without permission while a discussion is still ongoing, and that was inappropriate. Atsme Talk 📧 22:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Atsme: OK, may be. But what do you want now? It seems to me that renaming it back now isn't the right way to solve this issue. This would be the start of an edit-war. The only way I see is a confirmation of that place. Then it can be renamed. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hmmm... so I can challenge any image on Commons that I think is misnamed - one that has been in the same place for 8+ years - move it to where I think it should be with no verifiable proof beyond what a other photographers say (their word only), ignore the ones who say differently, and an admin cannot move it back? I will keep that in mind for future reference. Oh, and they are the ones who have been edit warring. Atsme Talk 📧 22:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Atsme: I don't understand why you are angry after me. They should have got your permission before editing and renaming the image, but Pierre Selim seems to agree with Ron Clausen, and it is true that the images on Flickr labelled as "Gulkana Glacier" are very similar. This may not be a definite proof, but these are reasons to question the name of the place. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I really think it's unfortunate to have renamed the file before the discussion is settled (no matter what is my opinion on the topic). I should have declined the rename request when I could, another user proceed with the renaming :(
I think looking for a wider audience on the topic still matters, we want to provide accurate information, Maybe VP or a wiki project where people are knowledgeable about this place. PierreSelim (talk) 12:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you, PierreSelim. Yann, I could never be angry with you. We go back too many years for that to happen. Admittedly, I was a little frustrated over the impatience of others, and probably more frustrated with myself for not taking better care of my original image files, including the cell phone images that have the GPS coordinates. I'm also reminded of the old adage...Thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken. 🤗 Atsme Talk 📧 16:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Admin Yann F,

A user uploaded this image but from the given source, the text was derived from wikipedia from a free license and no information on copyright is given about the image. The uploader seems to have uploaded quite a few copy vios. The youtube video from the source is not free. If you think the image is not free, please feel free to file a DR. The problem is from a google image search, the image appears to have originated from the source, but the source does not say if it is a free image.

By the way, Happy New Year for 2024. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I deleted this one, and a few more, started Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Andreas.stockhausen‎, and warned this user. Thanks for reporting. Yann (talk) 09:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Another one… 18:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Block request

Please block Kellycwl (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log, lock evasion of AXXXXK Tricono (talk) 09:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have no idea who User:AXXXXK is, but I`m pretty sure User:Tricono is KittenBroEeev [1] (feel free to check user me if you want to make sure I'm not User:AXXXXK lol) Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kelly The Angel That users likes to troll anti vandal user, account name is base on their classmate to create sock (Kellycwl) is one of them, pls report Kellycwl and Kiszek in m]SRG for global lock, thanks, both haven’t created in commons Zitaa123 (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Lava from erupting volcano in Iceland reaches houses in Grindavik.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinninn ♨ 10:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, thanks. Yann (talk) 10:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not fun when people lie about copyright on youtube. Very frustrating. Thanks for a quick response. --Steinninn ♨ 11:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Lava continues to flow from fissures after volcano erupts again in southwestern Iceland.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinninn ♨ 10:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Superseded: deletion request

"File:Kenkichi Tomimoto in front of his house, circa 1918.jpg", "File:Kenkichi Tomimoto (left) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg", "File:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his family, end of 1917.jpg", "File:Kenkichi Tomimoto, his family and his mother in front of his workshop, 1918.jpg". --Nanafuji (talk) 12:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nanafuji: These are different files, so not really Superseded. And please fix the source URLs. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Yann,

this file was just (7 months ago) kept in a regular deletion request, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Europa Park Stadion logo.jpg. If anybody disagrees with that outcome, there should be a new deletion request, but the file should not be speedied. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 23:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Right. I undeleted this, and declined the speedy deletion request. Yann (talk) 23:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Remove old version of file (copyright)

Hi Yann,

This file File:1945-05-28 Baseball's Miracle Man, Pete Gray.ogv is not the original version from the newsreel, but was uploaded in a truncated version with new audio from a 1990s documentary. I stripped the copyrighted audio. Can you please delete the old version?

I will try to add a better quality file (with the original audio, full length) anyway. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 23:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 23:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Admin Yann F,

I notice that this user uploaded several images before and after this image in December 2022 with a Google Pixel camera. But this image has metadata which says it belongs to the Louvre and was not taken with a Google camera. do you know if this image was derived from this 2012 source which makes it a copy vio or if it is own work? I am uncertain. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 12:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, right, so Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stèle de Minnakht - Musée du Louvre Antiquités Egyptiennes C 55 ; N 209.jpg. Yann (talk) 13:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello Leoboudv, Yann . It's my own photo. This was a wrong manipulation with another image to correct the perspective. Due to the resolution, this cannot be an image derived from the official site image. A new file with good metadata has been uploaded. Best regards --Shonagon (talk) 14:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks to have pointed the issue on EXIF metadata and closed the deletion request. Solved with new file. Best regards --Shonagon (talk) 15:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Behind the Door (1919) by Irvin Willat.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prospectprospekt (talk) 02:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is there any way we can remove the first twenty seconds of this file and the channel logo of the YouTube uploader in the top right of this file. I presume both of those are copyrighted and unneeded. (Oinkers42) (talk) 03:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@(Oinkers42): I replaced the MOTD with a higher resolution version without watermark: File:Conspiracy (1930) by Christy Cabanne HD.webm. Yann (talk) 10:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI: Copyvio image

INIYAN LAWRENCE (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log - This users' all uploads are copyvios. ~AntanO4task (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done I warned this user, and delete obvious copyvios. Any more upload should lead to a block. Yann (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Protection request

Hello.

Can you protect File:Brown rat distribution.png and keep it as it was originally uploaded, so that only administrators can upload and edit it? A user puts the unsubstantiated arguement that the entire Canadian province of Alberta, has no brown rats whatsoever and puts the arbitrary provincial boundaries as the distribution for the common brown rat, considering how baseless it seems that they stop at the provincial borders. The province has a presence of brown rats which are detected, which does not mean that it is totally devoid of brown rats.

Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (talk) 18:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done These accounts are probably socks, so could you please request a request for checkuser? Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you very much. Multituberculata (talk) 01:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]